Page 80 - DMGT409Basic Financial Management
P. 80

Unit 4: Cost of Capital




                                                                                                Notes
                                     Exhibit 5: Dr. Bhatt’s Analysis
             Subject: Nike’s Cost of Capital
             Based on the following assumptions, my estimate of Nike’s cost of capital is 8.4 percent :
             Single or Multiple Costs of Capital


             The  first question I considered was whether to use single or multiple costs of capital
             given that Nike has multiple business segments. Aside from footwear, which makes up
             62 per cent of revenue. Nike also sells apparel (30 per cent of revenue) that complement
             its footwear products. In addition, Nike sells sport balls, time-pieces, eyewear, skates, bats
             and other equipment designed for sports activities. Equipment products account for 3.6
             per cent of revenue. Finally, Nike also sells some non- Nike branded products such as Cole-
             Haan dress and casual footwear, and ice stakes, skate blades, hockey sticks, hockey jerseys
             and other products under the Bauer trademark, non-Nike brands account for 4.5 per cent
             of the revenue.
             I asked myself, whether Nike’s different business segments shad enough risks from each

             other to warrant different costs of capital. Were their profiles really different? I concluded
             that it was only the Cole-Haan line that was somewhat different : the rest were all sports-
             related businesses. However, since Cole-Haan makes up only a tiny fraction of the revenues,
             I did not think it necessary to compute a separate cost of capital. As for the apparel and
             footwear lines, they are sold through the same marketing and distribution channels and
             are often marketed in “collections” of similar design. I believe, they face the same risk
             factors, as such, I decided to compute only one cost of capital of the whole company.
             Methodology for Calculating the Cost of Capital; WACC
             Since Nike is funded with both debt and equity, I used the Weighted Average Cost of
             Capital (WACC) method. Based on the latest available balance sheet, debt as a proportion
             of total capital makes up 27.0 per cent and equity accounts for 73.0 per cent:
                Capital sources                   Book Values
               Debt

                Current portion of long-term debt        $ 5.4
               Notes payable                            855.3
               Long-term debt                           435.9
                                                     $ 1.291.2  → 27.0% of total capital

                                                     $ 3.494.5  → 72.0% of total capital
             Cost of Debt
             My estimate of Nike’s cost of debt is 4.3 per cent. I arrived at this estimate by taking
             total interest expense for the year 2001 and dividing it by the company’s average debt
             balance. The rare is lower than Treasury yields but that is because Nike raised a portion
             of its funding needs through Japanese yen notes, which carry rates between 2.0 per cent to
             4.3 per cent.
             After adjusting for tax, the cost of debt comes to 2.7 per cent. I used a tax rate of 38 per
             cent, which I obtained by adding state taxes of 3 per cent to the U.S. statutory tax rate.
             Historically, Nike’s state taxes have ranged from 2.5 per cent to 3.5 per cent.



                                                                                 Contd...




                                           LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                    73
   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85