Page 166 - DCAP601_SIMULATION_AND_MODELING
P. 166

Simulation and Modelling



                      Notes         4.   When the PERT/CPM charts become unwieldy, they are no longer used to supervise the
                                         project.

                                    9.3.3 Uncertainty in Project Scheduling

                                    During project execution, however, a real-life project will never execute exactly as it was planned
                                    due to uncertainty. It can be ambiguity resulting  from subjective  estimates that  are prone to
                                    human errors or it can be variability arising from unexpected events or risks. The main reason
                                    that the Project Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT) may provide inaccurate information
                                    about the project completion time is due to this schedule uncertainty. This inaccuracy is large
                                    enough to render such estimates as not helpful.
                                    One possibility to maximize solution sturdiness is to include safety in the baseline schedule in
                                    order to absorb the anticipated disruptions. This is called proactive scheduling. A pure proactive
                                    scheduling is a utopia, incorporating security in a baseline schedule that allows to cope with
                                    every possible disruption would lead to a baseline schedule with a very large make-span.




                                       Notes   A second approach, reactive scheduling, consists of defining a procedure to react to
                                       disruptions that cannot be absorbed by the baseline schedule.



                                    9.4 Critical Path Method (CPM)

                                    The critical path method is an algorithm for scheduling a set of project activities. It is an important
                                    tool for effectual project management.
                                    The Critical Path Method is a project modeling method developed in the late 1950s by Morgan
                                    R. Walker of DuPont and James E. Kelley, Jr. of Remington Rand. Kelley and Walker related
                                    their memories of the growth of CPM in 1989. Kelley attributed the term “critical path” to the
                                    developers of the Program Evaluation and Review Technique which was developed at about the
                                    same time by Booz Allen Hamilton and the US Navy. The precursors of what came to be known
                                    as Critical Path were urbanized and put into practice by DuPont between 1940 and 1943 and
                                    contributed to the success of the Manhattan Project.

                                    CPM is usually used with all forms of projects, including construction, aerospace and defense,
                                    software  development,  research  projects,  product  development,  engineering,  and  plant
                                    maintenance, among others. Any project with mutually  dependent activities  can apply this
                                    method of mathematical analysis.  Although the original CPM  program and  approach is no
                                    longer used, the term is usually applied to any approach used to analyze a project network logic
                                    diagram.

                                    Basic System

                                    The essential technique for using CPM is to construct a model of the project that includes the
                                    following:

                                    1.   A list of all activities required to complete the project (typically categorized within a work
                                         breakdown structure),
                                    2.   The time (duration) that each activity will take to completion, and

                                    3.   The dependencies between the activities




            160                              LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171