Page 205 - DMGT402_MANAGEMENT_PRACTICES_AND_ORGANIZATIONAL_BEHAVIOUR
P. 205

Management Practices and Organisational Behaviour




                    Notes          2.  Attitude Relevance: Another factor that affects the attitude-behaviour link is relevance.
                                       Attitudes that address an issue in which we have some self-interest are more relevant for
                                       us, and our subsequent behaviour is consistent with our expressed attitude.
                                   3.  Timing of Measurement: The timing of the measurement also affects attitude-behaviour
                                       correspondence. The shorter the time between the attitude measurement and the observed
                                       behaviour, the stronger the relationship.
                                   4.  Personality Factors: Personality factors also influence the attitude-behaviour link. One
                                       personality disposition that affects the consistency between attitudes and behaviour is
                                       self-monitoring. Low self-monitors display greater correspondence between their attitudes
                                       and behaviours. High self-monitors display little correspondence between their attitudes
                                       and behaviours  because they  behave according  to signals from others  and  from the
                                       environment.

                                   5.  Social  Constraints:  Social  constraints  affect  the  relationship  between attitudes  and
                                       behaviour.  The  social  context  provides  information about  acceptable  attitudes  and
                                       behaviours.

                                   9.6.7 Persuasion and Attitude Change


                                   People who depend for their living on changing attitudes, such as politicians and advertisers
                                   usually rely on more direct techniques than cognitive dissonance for inducing attitude change.
                                   Through some message, they hope to convince their audience to adopt a favourable view of
                                   their product, candidate, or idea. The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion, presented in
                                   the Figure 9.2 below, proposes that persuasion occurs over one of two routes: the central route
                                   and the peripheral route.

                                                 Figure  9.2: The  Elaboration Likelihood  Model of  Persuasion

                                                                                               Attitude change
                                       (Central Route)      High            Processing       depending on quality
                                                                              Careful
                                                         Elaboration
                                                                                                of arguments
                                      Message
                                                                                               Attitude change
                                                                                             depending on source
                                                            Low           Absence of careful   characteristics or
                                      (Peripheral Route)
                                                         Elaboration        processing
                                                                                            non-substantial aspects
                                                                                               of the message.

                                   Source: R.E Petty and J Cacioppo, "The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion", in L Berkowitz ed.,
                                   Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 19 (New York: Academic Press) 1986 page 123 - 205.
                                   1.  Central Route to Persuasion: Also called the systematic mode, occurs when the recipient
                                       of a persuasive message thinks about and evaluates the quality of the arguments presented
                                       in the communication, and either agrees or disagrees with the message on the basis of this
                                       evaluation. The central route to persuasion involves direct cognitive processing of the
                                       message's content. When an issue is personally relevant, the individual is motivated to
                                       think carefully about it. In the central route, the content of the message is very important.
                                       If the arguments presented are logical and convincing, attitude change will follow.
                                       Persuasion via the central route is not simply a matter of having some good arguments.
                                       It is a complex process, which can be broken down into five stages:
                                       (a)  Attention: The target audience must notice it and pay attention to it long enough to
                                            be exposed to your persuasive communication. If your arguments are uninteresting
                                            to your target, your arguments will have no effect.


          200                               LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210