Page 138 - DMGT501_OPERATIONS_MANAGEMENT
P. 138

Operations Management




                    Notes          5.3.2  Factors affecting Service Products

                                   In service, the capacity to deliver the service to the customer must first be determined; only then
                                   can the service be produced. What geographic area can you realistically service?


                                          Example: A hotel room must be available where the customer is when that customer
                                   needs it – a room available in another city is not much use to the customer.
                                   The primary parameters on which the geographical location decisions are  based for service
                                   products have been enumerated below:

                                   1.  Purchasing power of customer drawing area.
                                   2.  Service and image compatibility with demographics of the customer drawing area.
                                   3.  Competition in the area.
                                   4.  Quality of the competition.

                                   5.  Uniqueness of the firm's and competitor's locations.
                                   6.  Physical qualities of facilities and neighboring businesses.
                                   7.  Operating policies of the firm.
                                   8.  Quality of management.


                                          Example: Karim,  a speciality  restaurant  in  Delhi, had  opened  outlets  in the  major
                                   upcoming markets in Delhi, Noida and Gurgaon. In the malls that are coming up in and around
                                   Delhi, you see well known names like Marks and Spencer, McDonald's, Tissot, Canon Nike, etc.
                                   These are all decisions related to capacity.

                                   5.4 Selection of Site for the Plant


                                   When we see on the television news or read in the newspaper that a company has selected a site
                                   for a  new  plant, the  decision can appear to  be almost  trivial. Usually  it is  reported that a
                                   particular site was selected from among two or three alternatives and a few reasons are provided
                                   such as good community or  available land.  However, such media reports  conceal the long,
                                   detailed process for selecting a site for a major manufacturing facility.

                                          Example: When General Motors selected Spring Hill, Tennessee, as the location for their
                                   new Saturn Plant in 1985, it culminated a selection process that required several years and the
                                   evaluation of hundreds of potential sites.
                                   When the site selection process is initiated, the pool of potential locations for a manufacturing
                                   facility is, literally, global. Since proximity to customers is not normally an important location
                                   factor for a manufacturing plant, countries around the world become potential sites. As such, the
                                   site  selection  process  is  one  of  gradually  and  methodically  narrowing  down  the  pool  of
                                   alternatives until the final location is determined. In the following discussion we identify some
                                   of the more important factors that companies consider when determining the district, region,
                                   state and site at which to locate a facility.









          132                               LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143