Page 174 - DMGT521_PROJECT_MANAGEMENT
P. 174

Unit 10: Measuring Project Profitability




          different perspective; one cannot be a substitute for another, as the constitution of each is different,  Notes
          and each has been devised to assess a performance from a specific perspective.
          Is that all about a project when it comes to profitability assessment; may be not.

          One may usually start from ROI (IRR, NPV, and Payback Period (including McFarlan’s analysis,))
          to assess from returns perspective; however, it may not be true for s/w projects that we carry out
          for customers because this step would have already been done by customer. Nonetheless, it is
          the starting point for a project, though this accountability may not lie at our end, or we may not
          carry out the analysis exactly under those heads.
          Having said that, a project (unless it runs to some millions of dollars, or is of strategic importance)
          may not require these overall measures, instead we would be interested in data  in terms of
          “Earn vs.  Burn” (Earned Value). This is profitability from “delivery”  aspect. It has been in
          practice for more than a decade, and has matured over a period of time. Though, there are many
          variations and measures for this, a quick look upon CPI, SPI, and TCPI should provide enough
          pointers; getting into details, where these measures point trouble (may be potential one) is the
          subsequent step.

          10.1 Pay Back Period

          Payback period in capital budgeting refers to the period of time required for the return on an
          investment to “repay” the sum of the original investment. For example,  a $1000 investment
          which returned $500 per year would have a two year payback period. The time value of money
          is not taken into account. Payback period intuitively measures how long something takes to
          “pay for itself.” All else being equal, shorter payback periods are preferable to longer payback
          periods. Payback period is widely used because of its ease of use despite the recognized limitations
          described below.
          The term is also widely used in other types of investment areas, often with respect to energy
          efficiency technologies, maintenance, upgrades, or other changes. For example, a  compact
          fluorescent light bulb may be described as having a payback period of a certain number of years
          or operating hours, assuming certain costs. Here, the return to the investment consists of reduced
          operating  costs.  Although  primarily a  financial term,  the concept  of  a  payback  period  is
          occasionally extended to other uses, such as energy payback period (the period of time over
          which the  energy savings of a project equal  the amount  of energy  expended since project
          inception); these other terms may not be standardized or widely used.
          Payback period as a tool of analysis is often used because it is easy to apply and easy to understand
          for most individuals, regardless of academic training or field of Endeavour. When used carefully
          or to compare similar investments, it can be quite useful. As a stand-alone tool to compare an
          investment to “doing nothing,” payback period has no explicit  criteria for  decision-making
          (except, perhaps, that the payback period should be less than infinity).

          The payback period is considered a method of analysis with serious limitations and qualifications
          for its use, because it does not  account for the time value of money, risk, financing or  other
          important considerations, such as the opportunity cost. Whilst the time value of money can be
          rectified by applying a weighted average cost of capital discount, it is generally agreed that this
          tool for investment decisions should not be used in isolation. Alternative measures of “return”
          preferred by economists are net present value and internal rate of return. An implicit assumption
          in the use of payback period is that returns to the investment continue after the payback period.
          Payback period does not specify any required comparison to other investments or even to not
          making an investment.
          Payback period is usually expressed in years. Start by calculating Net Cash Flow for each year:
          Net Cash Flow Year 1 = Cash Inflow Year 1 - Cash Outflow Year 1. Then Cumulative Cash Flow



                                           LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                   169
   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179