Page 235 - DMGT545_INTERNATIONAL_BUSINESS
P. 235

International Business




                    notes          12.3.1 Types of Staffing Policy

                                   Research identifies three types of staffing policies in international businesses: the ethnocentric
                                   approach, the polycentric approach, and the geocentric approach. We will review each policy
                                   and link it to the strategy pursued by a firm. The most attractive staffing policy is probably the
                                   geocentric approach, although there are several impediments to adopting it.
                                   1.   The  Ethnocentric  Approach:  An  ethnocentric  staffing  policy  is  one  in  which  all  key
                                       management  positions  are  filled  by  parent-country  nationals.  This  practice  was  very
                                       widespread at one time. Firms such as Procter  & Gamble, Philips NV, and Matsushita
                                       originally followed it. In the Dutch firm Philips, for example, all  important positions in
                                       most foreign subsidiaries were at one time held by Dutch nationals who were referred to by
                                       their non-Dutch colleagues as the Dutch Mafia. In many Japanese and South Korean firms,
                                         such as, Toyota, Matsushita, and Samsung; key positions in international operations have
                                       often been held by home-country nationals. According to the Japanese Overseas Enterprise
                                       Association, in 1996, only 29 percent of foreign subsidiaries of Japanese companies had
                                       presidents who were not Japanese. In contrast, 66 percent of the Japanese subsidiaries of
                                       foreign companies had Japanese presidents.
                                       A firm pursues an ethnocentric staffing policy for three reasons:
                                       (i)   The firm may believe that the host  country lacks qualified individuals to fill senior
                                            management  positions.  This  argument  is  heard  most  often  when  the  firm  has
                                            operations in less developed countries.
                                       (ii)   The firm may see an ethnocentric staffing policy as the best way to maintain a unified
                                            corporate culture. Many Japanese firms, for example, prefer their foreign operations
                                            to be headed by expatriate Japanese managers because these managers have been
                                            socialized into the firm’s culture while employed in Japan. Procter & Gamble until
                                            recently preferred to staff important management positions in its foreign subsidiaries
                                            with US nationals who  had been socialized into P&G’s corporate culture by years of
                                            employment in its US operations. Such  reasoning tends to predominate when a firm
                                            places a high value on its corporate culture.

                                       (iii)  If the firm is trying to create value by transferring core competencies to a foreign
                                            operation, it may believe that the best way to do this is to transfer parent-country
                                            nationals who have knowledge of that competency to the foreign operation. Imagine
                                            what might occur if a firm tried to transfer a core competency in marketing to a
                                            foreign subsidiary without supporting the transfer with a corresponding transfer of
                                            home-country marketing management personnel. The transfer would probably fail to
                                            produce the anticipated benefits because the knowledge underlying a core competency
                                            cannot easily be articulated and written down. Such knowledge is acquired through
                                            experience.  Just  like  the  great  tennis  player  who  cannot  instruct  others  how  to
                                            become great tennis players simply by writing a handbook, the firm that has a core
                                            competency in marketing-or anything else-cannot just write a handbook that tells a
                                            foreign subsidiary how to build the firm’s core competency anew in a foreign setting.
                                            It must also transfer management personnel to the foreign operation to show foreign
                                            managers how to become good marketers. The need to transfer managers overseas
                                            arises because the knowledge that underlies the firm’s core competency resides in
                                            the heads of its domestic managers and was acquired through years of experience
                                            and not by reading a handbook. Thus, if a firm is to transfer a core competency to a
                                            foreign subsidiary, it must also transfer the appropriate managers.

                                       Despite  this  rationale  for  pursuing  an  ethnocentric  staffing  policy,  the  policy  is  now
                                       declining in  most international businesses for two reasons. First, an ethnocentric staffing
                                       policy  limits  advancement  opportunities  for  host-country  nationals.  This  can  lead  to
                                       resentment, lower productivity, and increased turnover among that group. Resentment



          230                              lovely Professional university
   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240