Page 236 - DMGT545_INTERNATIONAL_BUSINESS
P. 236

Unit 12: Basics of International HRM




               can be greater still if, as often occurs, expatriate managers are paid significantly more than   notes
               host-country nationals.
               Second,  an  ethnocentric  policy  can  lead  to  “cultural  myopia,”  the  firm’s  failure  to
               understand  host   country’s  cultural  differences  that  require  different  approaches  to
               marketing and management. The adaptation of expatriate managers can take a long time,
               during which they may make major mistakes. For example, expatriate managers may fail
               to appreciate how product attributes, distribution strategy, communications strategy, and
               pricing strategy should be adapted to host-country conditions. The result may be costly
               blunders. They may also make decisions that are ethically suspected simply because they
               do  not  understand  the  culture  in  which  they  are  managing.  In  one  highly  publicized
               case in the United States, Mitsubishi Motors was sued by the Federal Equal Employment
               Opportunity Commission for tolerating extensive and systematic sexual harassment in a
               plant in Illinois. The plant’s top management, all Japanese expatriates, denied the charges.
               The Japanese managers may have failed to realize that the behaviour that would be viewed
               as acceptable in Japan was not acceptable in the United States.



             Did u know?  It  is  still  a  widespread  practice  in  MNCs,  to  fill  key  positions  with  home
             country nationals.
          2.   The Polycentric Approach: A polycentric staffing policy recruits host-country nationals
               to manage subsidiaries while parent-country nationals occupy key positions at corporate
               headquarters. In many respects, a polycentric approach is a response to the shortcomings
               of an ethnocentric approach. One advantage of adopting a polycentric approach is that the
               firm is less likely to suffer from cultural myopia. Host-country managers are unlikely to
               make the mistakes arising from cultural misunderstandings to which expatriate managers
               are vulnerable. A second advantage is that a polycentric approach may be less expensive to
               implement, reducing the costs of value creation. Expatriate managers can be very expensive
               to maintain.
               A  polycentric  approach  also  has  its  drawbacks.  Host-country  nationals  have  limited
               opportunities  to  gain  experience  outside  their  own  country  and  thus  cannot  progress
               beyond senior positions in their own subsidiary. As in the case of an ethnocentric policy, this
               may cause resentment. Perhaps the major drawback with a polycentric approach, however,
               is the gap that can form between host-country managers and parent-country managers.
               Language barriers, national loyalties, and a range of cultural differences may isolate the
               corporate headquarters staff from the various foreign subsidiaries. The lack of management
               transfers from home to host countries, and vice versa, can exacerbate this isolation and lead
               to a lack of integration between corporate headquarters and foreign subsidiaries. The result
               can be a “federation” of largely independent national units with only nominal links to
               the corporate headquarters. Within such federation, the coordination required to transfer
               core competencies or to pursue experience curve and location economies may be difficult
               to achieve. Thus, although a polycentric approach may be effective for firms pursuing a
               localization strategy, it is inappropriate for other strategies.

               The  federation  that  may  result  from  a  polycentric  approach  can  also  be  a  force  for
               inertia within the firm. After decades of following a polycentric staffing policy, food and
               detergents giant Unilever found that shifting from a strategic posture that emphasized
               localization to a transnational posture was very difficult. Unilever’s foreign subsidiaries
               had evolved into quasi-autonomous operations, each with its own strong national identity.
               These ‘little kingdoms’ objected strenuously to corporate headquarters’ attempts to limit
               their autonomy and to rationalize global manufacturing.
          3.   The  Geocentric  Approach:  A  geocentric  staffing  policy  seeks  the  best  people  for  key
               jobs throughout the organization, regardless of nationality. This policy has a number of




                                           lovely Professional university                                   231
   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241