Page 265 - DMGT514_MANAGEMENT_CONTROL_SYSTEMS
P. 265

Management Control Systems




                    Notes          14.3.1 Tax Haven

                                   A tax haven country is one that has a low corporate income tax and low withholding tax rates on
                                   passive income. Some major tax haven countries are the Bahamas, Bahrain, Bermuda, British
                                   Virgin Islands, Cayman Islands, Channel Island and the Isles of Manama.
                                   Tax havens were once useful as locations for an  MNC to establish a wholly owned “Paper”
                                   foreign subsidiary that in turn would own the operating foreign subsidiaries of the MNC. In this
                                   arrangement, dividends could be routed through the tax haven affiliate, but the taxes due on
                                   them can be deferred until a dividend was declared by the tax haven subsidiary. Nowadays, the
                                   benefit of a tax haven subsidiary has been reduced because of two reasons:
                                   1.  Present corporate income tax rate of the parent company is not high in comparison to
                                       most non-tax haven countries, thus eliminating the need for deferral.
                                   2.  Rules governing controlled  foreign corporations have effectively eliminated the ability
                                       to defer passive income in a tax haven foreign subsidiary.
                                   14.3.2 Fronting Loans


                                   A fronting loan is a loan between a parent and its subsidiary channelled through a financial
                                   intermediary, usually a large international bank. In a direct intra-firm loan, the parent company
                                   lends cash directly to the foreign subsidiary and the subsidiary repays it later. In a fronting loan,
                                   the parent company deposits funds in an international bank, and the bank then lends the same
                                   amount to the foreign subsidiary. Thus, a US firm might deposit $ 100,000 in a London bank. The
                                   London bank then lends that $100,000 to an Indian subsidiary of the firm. From the bank’s point
                                   of view, the loan is risk-free because it has 100% collateral in the form of the parent’s deposit.
                                   The bank ‘fronts’ for the parent, hence the name. The bank makes a profit by paying the parent
                                   company a slightly  lower rate on its deposit than  it charges  the foreign  subsidiary on the
                                   borrowed funds.

                                   Firms use fronting loans  for two  reasons. First,  the fronting  loan can  circumvent  the  host
                                   company’s  restrictions on the remittance  of funds from a  foreign subsidiary to the  parent
                                   company. A host government  might restrict a foreign subsidiary from repaying a loan to its
                                   parent in order to preserve the company’s foreign exchange reserves, but is less likely to restrict
                                   a subsidiary’s ability  to repay  loan to  a large international bank, since stop payment to an
                                   international bank would hurt the company’s credit image whereas, withdrawing payment to
                                   the  parent company  would  probably  have  minimal  impact  on  its image.  Consequently,
                                   international business sometimes use fronting loans when they want to lend funds to a subsidiary
                                   based in a country with a fairly high political turmoil that might lead to restrictions on capital
                                   flows (i.e., when the level of political risk is high.)
                                   A fronting loan can be structured to provide tax advantages. For example, a tax haven (Bermuda)
                                   subsidiary i.e., 100% owned  by the  parent company  deposits $  million in  a London  based
                                   international bank at 8% interest. The bank in turn lends $ 1 million to a foreign operating
                                   subsidiary at 9% interest, (corporate tax rate is 50%). Under this arrangement, interest payment
                                   net of income tax will be as follows:

                                   1.  The foreign operating subsidiary  pays $90,000 interest to  the London Bank which  is
                                       equivalent to other tax costs of $45,000.
                                   2.  The London bank receives the $90,000. It retains $10,000 for its services and pays $80,000
                                       interest on deposit to the Bermuda subsidiary.
                                   3.  The Bermuda subsidiary receives $80,000 interest on deposit tax free.





          260                               LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270