Page 256 - DMGT519_Conflict Management and Negotiation Skills
P. 256

Conflict Management and Negotiation Skills




                    Notes          Within a society, these practices may not only be legal but ethical. Only when cultures with
                                   different value systems object, they become ethical issues. An example of change caused  by
                                   ethical value conflict is the formation of a coalition of major Western European and American
                                   sporting goods manufactures and child  advocacy groups to combat  the sale  of soccer balls
                                   stitched by children in Pakistan.
                                   Because of impoverishment, Pakistani parents in the Sialkot region of Punjab province force
                                   their children into soccer ball stitching as early as 6 years of age. According to one estimate,
                                   “Close to 10,000 Pakistani children under the age of 14 work up to 10 hours a day stitching the
                                   leather balls, often for the equivalent of $1.20 a day” (Greenhouse 1997). In Western Europe and
                                   the United States, where children play with these soccer balls, child labour is illegal and unethical.
                                   To avoid the experience of other efforts aimed at eliminating child labour that resulted in the
                                   unemployed children entering other occupations, including making bricks and prostitution, the
                                   coalition proposed to educate the children and to place parents and older siblings in jobs or
                                   provide small loans for them to start their own business.

                                       


                                     Case Study  The Negotiation Problem

                                     This case study shows how two parties can find a successful negotiation resolution by tackling the
                                     issues in a creative and mutually beneficial manner.

                                     One of the biggest stumbling blocks encountered by a negotiator is to clearly understand
                                     the real issues as the root cause and basis for the negotiation in the first place. All too many
                                     times, negotiators  take insufficient  time to  clearly identify  and frame the problem  or
                                     issues to be resolved and negotiated. This is the crucial first step to any negotiation. If this
                                     first phase of the negotiation process is not addressed properly, than it is quite likely that
                                     the  rest the whole negotiation  process will  unravel because the core  issues were not
                                     properly understood at the outset.
                                     Let’s look at an example case study which emphasizes the need to define and identify the
                                     problem. In this example, a substantial electronics firm faces considerable difficulties in
                                     one of their subassemblies. The root core of the problem revolved around certain types of
                                     fittings and pins that were becoming bent and distorted by the operation of the machinery.
                                     Units  which were  being produced were damaged  and had  to be  rejected because of
                                     imperfections. These rejected components were put aside and then re-worked later on in
                                     the month.
                                     This duplication of effort resulted in increased costs as workers had to work overtime to
                                     meet their quotas. These extra costs for the extra work performed had not been considered
                                     in the manufacturing  budget. The manager of this subassembly line did  not want be
                                     charged with these overhead expenses because  he felt it was not their responsibility.
                                     Likewise, the manager who was the overseer of the final assembly department also refused
                                     to accept the increased costs to his budget. He argued that the extra costs were a direct
                                     result of the poor work of the personnel in the subassembly department as this was where
                                     the problem  originated.
                                     The subassembly department manager  countered this  argument by claiming that  the
                                     parts were in good condition before they left his department and that the damage must
                                     have occurred in the final assembly manager’s department instead. Both parties had reached
                                     am impasse.
                                                                                                        Contd....




          250                               LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261