Page 200 - DMGT524_TOTAL_QUALITY_MANAGEMENT
P. 200

Unit 13: Total Productive Maintenance




                                                                                                Notes


             Case Study  Fine Papers, South Africa

             TQM has Positive Impact on Paper Manufacturers
             Fine Papers, a South African subsidiary of Sappi Limited, London, consisted of three mills,
             Enstra, Stanger and Adamas. The implementation of both TQM and Reliability Centred
             Maintenance (RCM) at the Enstra mill, an uncoated paper manufacturing unit, achieved a
             positive impact on availability, reliability, quality and the elimination of waste. However,
             quality was still variable and needed to be inspected throughout the process. As a further
             improvement, Statistical Process Control (SPC) was introduced, process standards were
             developed, and capability studies carried out. As a result, production processes were
             simplified, quality was in-built at source and a move from inspection to prevention was
             achieved. However, something was still lacking and the mill decided to implement Total
             Productive Maintenance (TPM). TPM is an approach that improves product and process
             reliability, which are important concepts in TQM. As part of the implementation of TPM:
             1.  A multi-disciplinary team, chaired by the production superintendent, was formed
                 and this enabled supplier issues such as non-conformance with specification of raw
                 materials to be addressed immediately; the supplier could be brought to the meeting
                 if required.
            2.   Autonomous maintenance tasks that enhanced and built on RCM methodologies
                 were identified as: (a) setup; (b) minor adjustments; (c) machine cleaning (to clean is
                 to inspect, which is a basic premise); (d) bolting (operators checking if bolts were
                 tight).
            3.   Identified training issues could also be addressed immediately by the human
                 resources representative.
            4.   Operational level day-to-day proactive problem identification and solving was
                 carried out using tools like the “five whys” to check whether other possible causes
                 of failure had been addressed-or whether failure could have been prevented and
                 what was needed to prevent possible reoccurrence of the failure.
            5.   Any problems identified were put on a gap list. Any gap that could not be closed by
                 the Strategic Business Unit team was then passed to the team at the next level, which
                 was known as the focus team.
            6.   A third-level team, called the integration team, was set up to solve problems at the
                 systemic level and a fourth level team, the strategic team, chaired by the general
                 manager and comprising all the heads of departments, was made responsible for
                 strategic issues and the entire productivity journey.
            Staff agreed that TPM helped the company as a result of its structured and systematic
            solution approach.
            Questions

            1.   Do you agree with the opening statement of the case “TQM has positive impact on
                 paper manufacturer”? Explain why or why not.
            2.   Explain how teams were used by the company and what are the advantages of using
                 teams in TQM?
            3.   Do you think TPM is useful for a manufacturing organization? How?
          Source:  http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/pune/DRDO-labs-adapting-to-TQM/articleshow/
          839174.cms)



                                           LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                   195
   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205