Page 89 - DMGT525_MATERIALS_MANAGEMENT
P. 89

Materials Management




                    Notes
                                                           Figure 6.2: Market Level Logistics



























                                   Source: Anderson Consulting
                                   Neither approach can achieve superior asset utilization or accommodate the segment-specific
                                   logistics necessary for excellent supply chain management. In many industries, especially such
                                   commodity  industries as fine paper, tailoring distribution assets to meet individual logistics
                                   requirements is a greater source of differentiation for a manufacturer than the actual products,
                                   which are largely undifferentiated.
                                   One paper company found radically different customer service demands in two key segments—
                                   large publishers with long lead times  and small  regional printers needing delivery  within
                                   24 hours. To serve both segments well and achieve profitable growth, the manufacturer designed
                                   a multilevel logistics network with three full-stocking distribution centers and 46 quick-response
                                   cross-docks, stocking only fast-moving items,  located near  the regional printers. Return on
                                   assets and revenues improved substantially thanks to the new inventory deployment strategy,
                                   supported by outsourcing of management of the quick response centers and the transportation
                                   activities.

                                   Principle 3: Listen to market signals and align demand planning accordingly across the
                                   supply chain, ensuring consistent forecasts and optimal resource allocation.

                                   Forecasting has historically proceeded silo by silo, with multiple departments independently
                                   creating forecasts for the same products—all using their own assumptions, measures, and level
                                   of detail. Many consult the marketplace only informally, and few involve their major suppliers
                                   in the process. The functional  orientation of  many companies  has just made things worse,
                                   allowing sales forecasts to envision growing demand while manufacturing second-guesses how
                                   much product the market actually wants.

                                   Such  independent,  self-centered  forecasting  is  incompatible  with  excellent  supply  chain
                                   management, as one manufacturer of photographic imaging found. This manufacturer nicknamed
                                   the warehouse “the accordion” because it had to cope with a production operation that stuck to
                                   a stable schedule, while the revenue-focused sales force routinely triggered cyclical demand by
                                   offering deep discounts at  the end of each  quarter. The manufacturer realized the need  to
                                   implement a cross-functional planning process, supported by demand planning software.





          84                                LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94