Page 20 - DMGT548_GLOBAL_HRM
P. 20

Unit 1: Introduction to Global HRM




                   and as a result increasing employment                                       Notes
                   prevent or reduce unemployment
                   generate additional income for the population, and
                   Finally, to increase tax revenue

          1.2.5 Competitive Drivers

          The globalisation is also affected by the competition. There are various forms of competitive
          drivers. If there is a strong competition in the industry, the greater  is the possibility of  the
          industry to globalise.
              Continuing increases in the level of world trade
              Increased ownership of corporations by foreign acquirers
              Rise of new competitors intent upon becoming global competitors

              Growth of global networks making countries interdependent in particular industries
              More companies becoming globally centred rather than nationally centred
              Increased formation of global strategic alliances

          1.2.6 Other  Drivers

              Revolution in information and communication

              Globalisation of financial markets
              Improvements in business travel

          1.2.7 Reasons for the Companies to go Global

          The reasons to go global are as follows:
          Growth: Is there anybody who would not accept that every company in the world, and equally
          its shareholders, management and staff wish to grow, to increase sales, and if possible profits, in
          order to secure their long-term future? The widely accepted hypothesis is after all valid that a
          company which does not achieve growth and stability, is – like a plant – condemned to death in
          the long-term, or to being pushed aside by increasingly powerful competitors. The opportunities
          for growth within the national territory are however often limited – although less often than is
          frequently  believed.
          The “No. 1 Position”: Size by itself, measured in absolute numbers, is usually not a key objective
          for the “multinationals”, since for such companies whether they generate sales of 30, 50 or a 100
          thousand million $ is  usually not  material in achieving a dominant position  in the  world
          market. Relative size is more important, i.e. the value of sales compared with those of competitors,
          and in particular the objective of being the largest and strongest in the own core market, even
          perhaps being “world market leader”. For example, Jürgen Schrempp, CEO of DaimlerChrysler
          is clearly pursuing with all the force at his disposal the objective of achieving the “No. 1 position
          in the World Car Manufacturers’ League” (Scholtys 2002).
          The objective of being or aiming to be No. 1 in the market is totally logical, considering that in
          the market economy, as in sport, the motto “winner  takes it all” definitely  applies: Once  a
          product, brand or a company has become market leader, and not just in its home country, but
          also in foreign markets, or even worldwide, then its position is self-reinforcing, because that



                                           LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                   15
   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25