Page 54 - DMGT548_GLOBAL_HRM
P. 54

Unit 3: Global Status and Control Mechanism in MNCs




          As  part of the process  of accommodating subsidiary concerns through decentralisation,  the  Notes
          MNC strives to adapt its HRM activities to each host-country’s specific requirements; this impacts
          the corporate HRM function. There is devolution of responsibility for local employee decisions
          to each subsidiary, with corporate HR staff performing a monitoring role, intervening in local
          affairs only in extreme circumstances.


                 Example: In the late-1980s, Ford Australia had a ceiling on its HRM decisions and any
          decision that involved an amount above that ceiling (such as promotions above a certain salary
          grade) had to be  referred to  its regional  Headquarters  for corporate approval.  Expatriate
          management remained the responsibility of corporate HR staff.
          This HRM monitoring role reflects management’s desire for central control of strategic planning–
          formulating, implementing, and coordinating strategies for its worldwide markets. The growth
          in  foreign exposure  combined with  changes in  the organisational structure of  international
          operations results in an increase in the number of employees needed to oversee the activities
          between the parent firm and its foreign affiliates.





              Task  Taking the example of any Indian firm, analyse the path which it will follow to
             become truly global with the changes in the structure and the HR policies.

          3.1.5 Global Matrix  Structure

          When a multinational is trying to integrate its operations in more than one dimension,  like
          product as well as area or customers and technology, it resorts to the matrix structure. Both
          product division and area division share joint responsibility. This means both executives jointly
          decide allocation of resources and other important matters but the matrix manager is responsible
          for the results.

                                     Figure 3.7: Matrix Structure

                                        Chief  Executive  Officer

                                                                      Human
                   Production      Marketing           Finance       Resources



                           Vice-President               Vice-President
                          Global  Products              International


                                 Europe       Americas      Asia-Pacific
                        Product  A

                        Product  B

                        Product  C
                                                             Australia
                                                         Human  Resources

          Source: Dowling et al. (2001) International Resource Management (p. 43)



                                           LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                   49
   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59