Page 217 - DCOM102_DMGT101_PRINCIPLES_AND_PRACTICES_OF_MANAGEMENT
P. 217

Unit 12: Organisational Change




                                                                                                Notes
             with working on specific  markets independently, especially Russia,  China and  India.
             Nokia had finally learnt from its folly of neglecting these growth markets.
             September 2003 saw Nokia marching ahead with its structural changes by dividing the
             company into four  divisions: mobile phones, multimedia phones, enterprise  solutions
             and networks. These divisions along with the cross-divisional  market operations  and
             technology platforms gave it a matrix structure attuned to the existing environment that
             needed flexibility (refer Exhibit 1: Nokia's Organisation Structure, 2003-2008). The divisions
             were small in size and  enabled faster  response in targeting markets  that were  vastly
             different with respect to feature demand and usage.

                                             Exhibit  1

















             This structure was significantly responsible for the growth that Nokia saw in this period,
             especially in the emerging markets. Nokia managed to overcome its mistake of allowing
             competitors like Motorola to run away with product innovations like flip phones. But
             Nokia's change-if-unfit methodology of dealing with its organisation structure ensured
             that the second wave of restructuring was not too far away.

             The First Wave Loses Steam
             The second wave of restructuring was necessitated by the changes in the rapidly growing
             marketplace. The existing  structure was  strained by  this growth which magnified  its
             deficiencies. Trouble started creeping in as technologies began to converge and the phones
             started becoming similar. Every phone in the market seemed to be offering similar features
             that drove the demand for a common platform. The structure was incapable of meeting
             such needs. The major issues faced by this structure were:

             1.  Repetition of work across divisions and non-standardisation of product
             2.  Poor coordination among divisional groups working on the same technology
             3.  Inability to develop any major expertise
             4.  This led to cost ineffectiveness and called for a major revamp and re-structuring in
                 Nokia.
             The Second Wave
             Nokia restructured itself into three main functional groups: Markets, Devices, and Software
             & Services (refer Exhibit 2: Global Architecture (New Structure), 2008).
             Markets: This division handles customer, front-end sales and the go-to-market strategy of
             Nokia sales worldwide.

                                                                                 Contd...



                                           LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                   209
   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222