Page 95 - DPOL201_WESTERN_POLITICAL_THOUGHT_ENGLISH
P. 95

Unit 6: Thomas Hobbes


          to his estrangement with Charles II. He returned to England and submitted to the republican  Notes
          government under Oliver Cromwell (1599-1658), and received a pension from Charles II (1630-
          1685). In 1655, De Corpore was published. In 1657, the Leviathan was reported to the parliamentary
          committee as “a most poisonous piece of atheism”.
          But in spite of ill health, his famous work, the Leviathan, appeared in April 1651. It was an astonishing
          method of publication, as Hobbes sent instalments each week from Paris to London for setting in
          type, with proofs being sent back within a week. The experience of Hobbes to the reaction of his
          work was terrifying, and in the last part of his life he attempted many books to vindicate himself.
          In 1688, a revised Latin edition of the Leviathan was published. In 1670, the Behemoth was published.
          In 1683, the Leviathan and the De Cive were condemned and burned at Oxford University.





                   In 1647, Hobbes fell seriously ill, and could never recover fully. From 1648, he started
                   developing symptoms which indicated Parkinson’s disease.

          Hobbes served the Cavendish family faithfully for more than four generations, and in his old age
          was treated by the family as more than a servant, but less than an honoured guest. In October
          1679, he fell ill and finally died of paralysis on 3 December. “He seems in fact to have died much
          as he had lived, a witty and skeptical humanist”. It was said of Hobbes that he worked hard for
          his longevity. John Aubrey, his biographer and friend, tells of the exercises, walking up and down
          hills very fast, playing tennis and having rub-downs as measures that Hobbes undertook for
          keeping fit. Moreover, during the night after everyone had gone to sleep, Hobbes would sing a
          “prick-song”. “Here then is a philosopher with a very unphilosophic aversion to death, an aversion
          that Hobbes eventually posited as fundamental to human nature and a force for wisdom in human
          affairs”. Hobbes spent his time mediating and philosophizing, writing down his “darting thoughts”
          in a notebook that he always carried with him. He was a voracious reader, and read anything that
          he came across. He was conscious of being a self-taught philosopher.

          6.2 Developments in Science and their Influence on Hobbes
          Philosophically and methodologically, Hobbes was influenced by new developments in the physical
          sciences and by the works of Bacon, Kepler and Galileo. This was the period not only of religious
          strife, but also of scientific temperament, for there was immense curiosity about nature and the
          desire to eschew the supernatural. Both Bacon and Kepler visualized an order behind the diversity
          in the universe. Galileo laid down the principles of mechanics, observing that the task of a scientist
          was to discover primitive notions of complex objects in simple ones. He rejected Aristotle, and
          looked to Plato’s Timaeus for an understanding of the universe.
          Plato was the earliest among philosophers to understand the implications of the Pythagorean
          formula of “One behind the Many”, by the use of mathematics to study Forms or Idea that were
          behind the world of senses subject to motion and change. However, with Galileo and others, the
          question was to construct a mathematical theory of motion, rather than of motionless Form. The
          general tone of the new science tried to despiritualize nature, by abolishing the distinction between
          animate and inanimate. It clearly identified and established the difference between the inner from
          the outer worlds. The new science explained the natural world mechanically with reference to
          simple motions. The inner world was subjective, and the outer world objective. The relationship
          between the two was contingent. It assumed that thinking was an activity that took place within
          one’s mind, which could be deciphered by none other than the thinking subject. A subject’s
          thoughts could not be understood by his external actions and behaviour.


                                           LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                        89
   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100