Page 90 - DECO401_MICROECONOMIC_THEORY_HINDI

O;f"V vFkZ'kkL=k osQ fl¼kar

uksV izkjaHk esa miHkksDrk ¯cnq Q ij larqyu esa gS tgk¡ ctV js[kk AB vkSj rVLFkrk oØ IC ,d nwljs dks Li'kZ
djrs gSaA lscksa dh dher osQ fxjus osQ dkj.k] dher js[kk nkb± vksj ljd dj AC gks tkrh gSA miHkksDrk vc
¯cnq R ij larqyu esa gS tgk¡ rVLFkrk oØ IC vkSj ctV js[kk AC ,d nwljs dks Li'kZ dj jgh gSA ¯cnq
1
Q ls ¯cnq R ij xfr ;k lapyu lscksa dh OL ls OM ek¡xh xbZ ek=kk esa ifjorZu dks izdV djrk gSA ;g
gh dher izHkko gSA vr%

dher izHkko = OM – OL = LM

LyVLdh miHkksDrk dh okLrfod vk; dks fLFkj j[kus osQ fy;s mlls ekSfnzd vk; dh AS ek=kk okil ys
dj izfrLFkkiu izHkko dks i`Fkd djosQ fn[kkrk gSA blfy, ¯cnq Q }kjk izdV lsckas vkSj larjksa osQ izkjafHkd
la;ksx osQ :i esa miHkksDrk dh okLrfod vk; fLFkj
jgrh gSA vr% ubZ ctV js[kk SS ¯cnq Q esa ls oqQN egÙoiw.kZ voyksdu
fudyrh gqbZ AC js[kk osQ lekukarj [khaph xbZ gSA (a) ½.kkRed izfrLFkkiu izHkko ek¡x osQ fu;e osQ
ubZ ctV js[kk SS rVLFkrk oØ IC dks ¯cnq T ij leku] oLrq dh ek¡xh xbZ ek=kk vkSj mldh dher
2
Li'kZ dj jgh gS tks de gqbZ ekSfnzd vk; rFkk fLFkj osQ chp ½.kkRed lacaèk dks izdV djrk gSA
okLrfod vk; osQ vuq:i larqyu osQ u, ¯cnq osQ (b) ½.kkRed vk; izHkko ek¡x osQ fu;e osQ foijhr
:i esa mHkj dj vkbZ gS ijarq miHkksDrk dh oLrq dh dher rFkk mldh ek¡xh xbZ ek=kk osQ
okLrfod vk; fLFkj gSA miHkksDrk larqyu ¯cnq T chp èkukRed lacaèk dks izdV djrk gSA
(c) ek¡x osQ fu;e dk mYya?ku rc gksrk gS tc vk;
ij lscksa dh ON ek=kk dh ek¡x djrk gSA tcfd
izHkko izfrLFkkiu izHkko dh rqyuk esa vfèkd
izkjaHk esa og OL ek=kk dh ek¡x dj jgk FkkA budk
'kfDr'kkyh gksrk gS] ;g fLFkfr fxÝiQu oLrqvksa
(ON – OL = LN) izfrLFkkiu izHkko gSA vr%
osQ lacaèk esa mRiUu gksrh gSA
izfrLFkkiu izHkko = ON – OL = LN
vk; izHkko = LM – LN = NM
dher izHkko (LM) = izfrLFkkiu izHkko (LN) + vk; izHkko (NM)

4-26 LyVLdh dk n`f"Vdks.k fgDl osQ n`f"Vdks.k ls fdl izdkj fHkUu gS\
(How Slutsky’s Approach Differs from Hick’s Approach?)

fgDl rFkk LyVLdh nksuksa vk; izHkko dks fuf"Ø; (Neutral) djosQ izfrLFkkiu izHkko dks dher izHkko
ls i`Fkd (Isolate) djrs gSaA nksuksa miHkksDrk ls ekSfnzd vk; dk ,d Hkkx okil ysdj ,slk djrs gSa rkfd
oLrq dh dher fxjus ls igys tks mldh okLrfod vk; Fkh og fLFkj cuh jgsA ijarq nksuksa dh èkkj.kkvksa esa
fuEufyf[kr varj gSμ
fgDl osQ vuqlkj miHkksDrk ls mruh ekSfnzd vk; okfil ys ysuh pkfg;s ftlls og viuh okLrfod vk;
ls larqf"V osQ iqjkus Lrj (Old Level of Satisfaction) dks dk;e j[k losQ vFkkZr~ izkjafHkd rVLFkrk js[kk
ij cuk jg losQA bl fLFkfr esa tks ubZ ctV js[kk [khaph tkrh gS og izkjafHkd rVLFkrk oØ dks Li'kZ djrh gSA
LyVLdh osQ vuqlkj vfèkd ekSfnzd vk; okil ys yh tk;s tks miHkksDrk dh okLrfod vk; dks nks oLrqvksa
osQ iqjkus la;ksx (Old Combination of the Two Goods) ij fLFkj dj nsrh gSA
fyIlh osQ 'kCnksa esa] ^^fgDl osQ n`f"Vdks.k esa larqf"V dks fLFkj j[kdj vk; izHkko dks gVk;k tkrk gS]
tcfd LyVLdh osQ n`f"Vdks.k esa Ø;'kfDr dks fLFkj j[kdj vk; izHkko dks gVk;k tkrk gSA** (In
Hicks’s approach the income effect is removed by holding satisfaction constant,
while in Slutsky’s approach it is removed by holding purchasing power constant.)
—Lipsey

84 LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY