Page 374 - DEDU504_EDUCATIONAL_MEASUREMENT_AND_EVALUATION_ENGLISH
P. 374

Educational Measurement and Evaluation



                   Notes                   (7)  For meaningfulness of value of t, either of 0.05 or 0.01 meaningful levels are chosen.
                                               If the value of  t is meaningful, the statement is accepted as a statement of
                                               discriminating power. If the value of n is large, that is more than 30, then it can be
                                               taken as meaningful at 0.05 level on its value being more than 1.65, and at 0.01 on it
                                               being more than 2.33. If the value of n is small, it would need to refer to the t values
                                               table for seeing its meaningfulness. In the following table number—4, the values of
                                               t have been shown for its meaningfulness at .05 and .01 levels. The value of degree
                                               of freedom is known by the following formula for comparison of two groups :
                                                                    d = n  + n – 2
                                                                     f  H   L
                                               In which,            d = Degree of freedom
                                                                     f
                                                                   n = Number of people in the top group
                                                                    H
                                                                   n = Number of people in the bottom group
                                                                    L
                                                                       Table
                                                              t-Values for One tailed Test
                                                           dt             .05           .01

                                                           10            1.81           2.76
                                                           20            1.72           2.53
                                                           30            1.70           2.46
                                                           40            1.68           2.48
                                                           50            1.68           2.40
                                                           60            1.67           2.39
                                                           70            1.67           2.38
                                                           80            1.66           2.38
                                                           90            1.66           2.37
                                                          100            1.66           2.36
                                                          200            1.65           2.35
                                                          300            1.65           2.34
                                                          400            1.65           2.34
                                                      more than 500      1.65           2.33

                                           (8)  On the basis of meaningful value of t, 30-40 statements are selected. Care is taken in
                                               selection of statements to see that some of the statements are positive and some of
                                               them negative.
                                           (9)  The selected statements are arranged in a random order to prepare the attitude
                                               scale.
                                           (10) Having prepared the attitude scale, the reliability and validity of the scale is found
                                               out using Test-retest method or Split-half method.
                                           (11) Thus prepared attitude scale is administered on those people whose attitude has to
                                               be measured. Their scores on various statements of the scale are obtained according
                                               to the above mentioned marking process. The obtained scores of a person on all
                                               statements will indicate his attitude.
                                           (12) For analysis of obtained scores, they can be changed into t-values or percentiles.
                                               The constructor of the attitude scale can also prepare a conversion table for it.
                                       (iv)  Suffir’s Method of Successive Difference : The method of successive difference
                                           developed by Suffir is an improved form of Thurston’s and Chave’s Equal Appearing
                                           Intervals method. Its scale statements need the decisions of only one person. So, when
                                           the number of statements is large, this method is appropriate. In this method, the



         368                               LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379