Page 209 - DENG502_PROSE
P. 209

Unit 20: David Hume-Of Essay Writing ...


          proved, systems in physics may be controverted; but the harmony of verse, the tenderness of  Notes
          passion, the brilliancy of wit, must give immediate pleasure (EPM, 171).
           We do not infer that a sunset is beautiful and so deserving of approbation. We see the sunset, and
          the visual impressions please us. If we have the proper point of view, we are justified in saying
          that the sunset is beautiful. This verdict is more than a report or expression of the sentiment, yet
          the sentiment is an irreplaceable element of the judgment. A parallel claim is made of moral
          discrimination. “Pleasure and pain,” he insists, are the “essence” of beauty and deformity (T, 299).
          But how does a a literary work “give immediate pleasure”?





                       Taste is the capacity to respond with approbation and disapprobation. But how
                       does taste relate to Hume’s various remarks about “perceptions” and “discernments”
                       of beauty, of our “judging” a work, and of critics who “give judgment” and who
                       “give” or “pronounce” a “verdict” or “recommendation” (SOT, passim)?

          One of Hume’s most puzzling claims is that taste is an “immediate” response. In his extended
          treatment of the passions and emotions in the Treatise, Hume says that “immediate” feelings are
          ones that do not involve the “interposition” of ideas (T, 275). Some pleasures and pains are
          “immediate” in the sense that they are impressions that immediately accompany other impressions
          (e.g., the experience of a very hot flame is accompanied by an experience of pain). How does a
          literary work “give immediate pleasure”? Taken literally, Hume appears to claim that literary
          works are beautiful independent of the audience’s ability to assign ideas or meanings to the
          words. But this is certainly not Hume’s position. The solution is that that there is “mental, as well
          as bodily taste” (SOT, 274). Moral and aesthetic discrimination depend on mental taste. The requisite
          sentiments are spontaneous products of the mind, but they are not uninformed responses.
          Mental taste normally requires some intervening thought process. So the pleasures and pains of
          aesthetic judgment are not immediate in being direct responses to other impressions.
          Some species of beauty, especially the natural kinds, on their first appearance, command our
          affection and approbation; and where they fail of this effect, it is impossible for any reasoning to
          redress their influence, or adapt them better to our taste and sentiment. But in many orders of
          beauty, particularly those of the finer arts, it is requisite to employ much reasoning, in order to feel
          the proper sentiment; and a false relish may frequently be corrected by argument and reflection.
          There are just grounds to conclude, that moral beauty partakes much of this latter species, and
          demands the assistance of our intellectual faculties, in order to give it a suitable influence on the
          human mind (EPM, 173).
          Mental taste arises in response to ideas that arise in response to impressions (e.g., viewing a
          photograph occasions thoughts about the place pictured, leading to thoughts about experiences
          one had or might have there, and the thoughts arising in this imaginative process are pleasurable
          or painful). Hume regards this “immediacy” of taste as entirely compatible with the influence of
          intellectual and imaginative faculties.
          Taste is immediate and spontaneous, yet the application of “good sense” and “reason” improves
          it (SOT, 277). Taste is not improved by reasoning from a priori normative principles. Moral and
          aesthetic discriminations “are not conclusions of reason” (T, 457). Neither results from a mere
          “comparing of ideas” (T, 463). However, taste can be influenced by consultation of “general rules
          of art” or “rules” that “are founded only on experience and observation” (SOT, 270). Mental taste
          involves reason in the sense of “sound understanding,” which ultimately depends on imaginative
          associations of ideas. So taste involves imaginative pleasure, as Addison proposed. This doctrine of
          imaginative pleasure has no special connection with creativity or with the capacity to produce art.


                                           LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                       203
   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214