Page 225 - DENG502_PROSE
P. 225

Unit 20: David Hume-Of Essay Writing ...


          Comprehensiveness vs. Discrimination Notice that (3) and (4) are not identical claims. The former  Notes
          suggests the existence of a general and more comprehensive rule, the latter only something that
          could be used in discriminatory way so that different artworks and aesthetic judgments could be
          ranked. Hume hopes to be able to find at least (4) if it turns out that the sentiments of men are so
          different that they cannot be possibly harmonized (3). But throughout the essay he vacillates
          between these two kinds of standards (the more ambitious one and the more discriminative one).
          Objection One kind of philosophy (skeptical) opposes the idea that there is any standard of taste.
          It asserts the equal right of every personal evaluation. In that respect, it agrees with one strain of
          common sense which preaches the equal value of all taste. These are the main characteristics of
          this position:
          The refusal of any standard of taste is based on one fundamental distinction that sharply separates
          the nature of sentiments from that of judgments. This distinction corresponds to the distinction
          between taste and opinion. The former is a matter of feelings, the latter of facts. Other differences
          could be represented as follows:
          As Hume states at the beginning of the essay, there is a huge variety of taste (sentiments) and
          opinion (judgments). While all sentiments regarding one and the same object are right, only one
          opinion out of many possible could be right. We can conclusively resolve factual disputes by
          matching opinions with relevant facts, we cannot but “acquiesce” to our subjective feelings in
          matters of what we like or dislike. Taste is a kind of sentiment and therefore subjective. There is
          a parallel between bodily and mental taste to the effect that both are subjective.
          Beauty - Deformity  Beauty and deformity are not objective qualities. They exist only in the mind
          as the sentiments of blame and approbation exist in our heart. Some people will regard object
          beautiful that others perceive as ugly. Therefore it is fruitless to seek the real beauty and deformity
          as is fruitless to seek the real sweet or real bitter.
          The prominence of taste and beauty in the discussion of art is defining for the 18th century
          aesthetics. Hume is here under influence of Francis Hutcheson (1694-1747) who held that beauty
          is not a quality of objects but a subjective idea. Another point of agreement with his contemporaries:
          mental (aesthetic) taste is very similar in its functioning and status with physiological (bodily)
          taste. Hume pursues this analogy throughout the essay.  What makes something sweet or bitter is
          the disposition of the organs that are aroused by the perception of certain object. The same holds
          true of beauty and deformity. The disposition of our organs (that is, its previous or current condition)
          decides what we’ll like or dislike. If we put our left hand in a bucket with cold water while
          holding the right hand in the bucket with hot water and then both immerse in a vessel. Aesthetic
          sentiments like beauty and perfection are in fact more subjective than bodily taste because aesthetic
          feelings depend ml with lukewarm water we’ll have two different sensations.
          Aesthetic sentiments like beauty and perfection are in fact more subjective than bodily taste because
          aesthetic feelings depend more on the consciousness of the perceiving individual and are therefore
          more idiosyncratic. Therefore it is in vain to seek objective, “real”, “true” beauty. However, there
          is another strain of common sense (and another kind of philosophy, although not named by
          Hume). It recognizes the obvious differences in quality between various artists and artworks and
          asserts the objectivity and inequality of taste. Some judgments of taste are just plainly wrong
          whereas some other are obviously right. This position (represented by Thomas Reid) is characterized
          by the following features:
          1. Philosophy Objectivist Criticism
          2. Common Sense 2nd Type
          3. Standard Yes
          4. Justification Inequality of Taste




                                           LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                       219
   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230