Page 110 - DMTH505_MEASURE_THEOREY_AND_FUNCTIONAL_ANALYSIS
P. 110

Unit 9: Measure Spaces




                                                             –1
          Proof: Let  be a  -algebra of subsets of the set Y. To show that f  () is a  -algebra of subsets of  Notes
                                                                 –1
                                     –1
                                                –1
          the set D (f) we show that D (f)  f  (); if A  f  () then D (f)\A  f  (); and for any sequence
          (A  : n   ) in f  () we have U  A    f  (B).
                                           –1
                       –1
            n                       n    n
          1.   By (1) of above theorem, we have D (f) = f  (Y)   f  (B) since Y   .
                                                 –1
                                                        –1
                      –1
                                   –1
                                                                        C
                                                                            –1
                                                         C
                                                                     –1
          2.   Let A  f  (). Then A = f  () for some B  . Since B    we have f  (B )  f  (). On the
                                                       C
                                                    –1
               other hand by (2) of above theorem, we have f  (B ) = D (f)\f  (B) = D (f)\A. Thus D (f)\A
                                                               –1
                 –1
                 f  ().
                                                        –1
          3.   Let (A  : n   ) be a sequence in f  (). Then A  = f  (B ) for some B     for each n   .
                                          –1
                    n                                n     n          n
               Then by (3) of above theorem, we have
                                  A n   f (B ) f  1   B  n  f ( ) ,
                                                             
                                           1
                                                            1
                                              n
                                 n    n           n 
                    
                           
               since   B n  ( ) .
                    n 
          Measurable Mapping
          Definition: Given two measurable spaces (X, ) and (Y, ). Let f be a mapping with D (f)  X and
           (f)   Y. We say that f is a / measurable mapping if f  (B)   for every B   , that is, f  ()
                                                        –1
                                                                                   –1
            .
          Theorem 4: Given two measurable spaces (X, ) and (Y, ). Let f be a /-measurable mapping.
          (a)  If , is a  -algebra of subsets of X such that ,   , then f is  /-measurable.
                                                                1
          (b)  If   is a  -algebra of subsets of Y such that     , then f is / -measurable.
                  0                                0               0
                              –1
                                                             –1
          Proof: (a) Follows from f  ()        and (b) from f  (B )   f  ()   .
                                                      –1
                                         1               0
          Composition of two measurable  mappings is a measurable mapping provided  that the two
          measurable mappings from a chain.
          Theorem 5: Given two measurable spaces (X, ) and (Y, ), where =   () and  is arbitrary
          collection of subsets of Y. Let f be a mapping with D (f)   and (f)   Y. Then f is a /-
          measurable mapping of D (f) into Y if and only if f  ()   .
                                                   –1
          Proof: If f is a /-measurable mapping of D (f) into Y, then f  ()    so that f  ()   .
                                                                              –1
                                                               –1
          Conversely if f  ()   , then   (f  ()    () = . Now by theorem,
                                     –1
                      –1
          “Let f be a mapping of a set X into a set Y. Then for an arbitrary collection C of subsets of Y, we
                        –1
                 –1
          have   (f  ()) = f  (  ().”
                            –1
                                      –1
            (f  () = f  (  ()) = f  (). Thus f  ()    and f is a /- measurable mapping of D (f).
             –1
                   –1
          Theorem 6: If X  is a thick subset of a measure space (X, S,  ), if S  = S   X , and if, for E in S,   (E
                      0                                      0      0               0
             X ) =   (E), then (X , S ,  ) is a measure space.
             0             0  0  0
          Proof: If two sets, E  and E , in S are such that E    X  = E    X , then (E    E )   X  = 0, so that
                          1    2                1   0   2   0      1   2   o
          (E    E ) = 0 and therefore   (E ) =  (E ). In other words   is indeed unambiguously defined on
            1   2                  1     2              0
          S .
           0
          Suppose next that {F } is a disjoint sequence of sets in S , and let E  be a set in S such that
                           n                          0        n
                                    F = E    X , n = 1, 2, … .
                                      n   n   0
                                           LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                   103
   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115