Page 110 - DMTH505_MEASURE_THEOREY_AND_FUNCTIONAL_ANALYSIS
P. 110
Unit 9: Measure Spaces
–1
Proof: Let be a -algebra of subsets of the set Y. To show that f () is a -algebra of subsets of Notes
–1
–1
–1
the set D (f) we show that D (f) f (); if A f () then D (f)\A f (); and for any sequence
(A : n ) in f () we have U A f (B).
–1
–1
n n n
1. By (1) of above theorem, we have D (f) = f (Y) f (B) since Y .
–1
–1
–1
–1
C
–1
C
–1
2. Let A f (). Then A = f () for some B . Since B we have f (B ) f (). On the
C
–1
other hand by (2) of above theorem, we have f (B ) = D (f)\f (B) = D (f)\A. Thus D (f)\A
–1
–1
f ().
–1
3. Let (A : n ) be a sequence in f (). Then A = f (B ) for some B for each n .
–1
n n n n
Then by (3) of above theorem, we have
A n f (B ) f 1 B n f ( ) ,
1
1
n
n n n
since B n ( ) .
n
Measurable Mapping
Definition: Given two measurable spaces (X, ) and (Y, ). Let f be a mapping with D (f) X and
(f) Y. We say that f is a / measurable mapping if f (B) for every B , that is, f ()
–1
–1
.
Theorem 4: Given two measurable spaces (X, ) and (Y, ). Let f be a /-measurable mapping.
(a) If , is a -algebra of subsets of X such that , , then f is /-measurable.
1
(b) If is a -algebra of subsets of Y such that , then f is / -measurable.
0 0 0
–1
–1
Proof: (a) Follows from f () and (b) from f (B ) f () .
–1
1 0
Composition of two measurable mappings is a measurable mapping provided that the two
measurable mappings from a chain.
Theorem 5: Given two measurable spaces (X, ) and (Y, ), where = () and is arbitrary
collection of subsets of Y. Let f be a mapping with D (f) and (f) Y. Then f is a /-
measurable mapping of D (f) into Y if and only if f () .
–1
Proof: If f is a /-measurable mapping of D (f) into Y, then f () so that f () .
–1
–1
Conversely if f () , then (f () () = . Now by theorem,
–1
–1
“Let f be a mapping of a set X into a set Y. Then for an arbitrary collection C of subsets of Y, we
–1
–1
have (f ()) = f ( ().”
–1
–1
(f () = f ( ()) = f (). Thus f () and f is a /- measurable mapping of D (f).
–1
–1
Theorem 6: If X is a thick subset of a measure space (X, S, ), if S = S X , and if, for E in S, (E
0 0 0 0
X ) = (E), then (X , S , ) is a measure space.
0 0 0 0
Proof: If two sets, E and E , in S are such that E X = E X , then (E E ) X = 0, so that
1 2 1 0 2 0 1 2 o
(E E ) = 0 and therefore (E ) = (E ). In other words is indeed unambiguously defined on
1 2 1 2 0
S .
0
Suppose next that {F } is a disjoint sequence of sets in S , and let E be a set in S such that
n 0 n
F = E X , n = 1, 2, … .
n n 0
LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY 103