Page 182 - DECO405_MANAGERIAL_ECONOMICS
P. 182

Unit 11: Monopolistic Competition




                                                                                                Notes


             Caselet     Market Entry and the Vanilla Syndrome

                n most categories of consumer products, there is one dominant segment; glucose in
                biscuits, cola in soft drinks, vanilla in ice creams. These are good categories, but the
             Isame thing can be extended to other product categories.
             Now the tendency is that when a new player wants to enter an established product category,
             he automatically looks  at the  dominant segment first. The MD and  CEO, Ashok  Jain,
             Cadbury Schweppes Beverages India Private Limited, calls it a "Vanilla trap". He explains
             this as follows:
             “A trap because you, as the new entrant, can never come close to challenging the dominance
             of the biggest player in that vanilla segment. So what you get into is a syndrome: "Can I
             get two-to-three per cent market share in that segment?” The segment spells sheer volume,
             so this share would be larger than 15 per cent of some other segment in the category.
             That's where the trap is. The segment's Goliath is so big, you'll get routed, like it or not.
             So what do you do instead? I suggest the "blackcurrant route". A route where you take
             something else and make yourself dominant there, while getting a foot into the dominant
             segment as well (you can't afford not to).
             And what'll happen? While people will come for your blackcurrant, they will buy your
             vanilla. Your volumes will still come from your vanilla. But for top-of-mind consumer,
             the trademark  blackcurrant is what will identify you. This is theory. It's happened. I'll
             give you three examples.
             When Cadbury India decided to extend to biscuits, it started off by challenging Parle in
             glucose, a segment where Parle's strength is unmatched. Cadbury didn't succeed. By the
             time it launched chocolate biscuits, it was too late.
             There was a lesson here, which was extended to ice creams, the next category Cadbury
             entered. The brand, Dollops, harped on its blackcurrant ice cream, didn't talk vanilla at all,
             but the volumes came from vanilla anyway.
             Then take Britannia. For years, it tried to break Parle's dominance in glucose biscuits, with
             little success. It then went in for a number of branded products that gave it an aura and
             gained it respect and attention. Little Hearts was so different, it gave Britannia distinction.
             And then, the company launched Tiger, a glucose biscuit. Tiger is now a very large brand
             in the glucose segment.
             You've got to have something that's very specially your own. Otherwise, the consumer
             won't pay you much attention and the trade won't want to stock your products – why
             should it? The retailer looks Cadbury Schweppes' way because of Crush and Canada Dry.
             Our largest volumes come from Sport Cola. The brand sells much more than Crush.
             Proves my point, doesn't it?
             I  say again:  you can't  fight the  dominant guy  in the  dominant segment.  Get into  his
             segment's volumes indirectly, instead.”












                                            LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                  177
   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187