Page 192 - DECO405_MANAGERIAL_ECONOMICS
P. 192

Unit 12: Oligopoly




                 insignificant. When any firm takes an action its rivals will in all probability react to it (i.e.  Notes
                 retaliate). The behaviour of oligopolistic firms is interdependent and not independent or
                 atomistic as is the case under perfect or monopolistic competition.
            2.   The demand curve of an individual firm under oligopoly is not known and is indeterminate
                 because it depends upon  the reaction of its  rivals which  is uncertain.  Each theory of
                 oligopoly therefore makes a specific assumption about how rivals will (or will not) react
                 to an individual firm's action.
            3.   In view of the uncertainty about the reaction of rivals and interdependence of behaviour,
                 oligopolistic firms find it advantageous to coordinate their behaviour through explicit
                 agreement (cartel) or implicit, hidden, understanding (collusion). Also because the number
                 of firms is small, it is feasible for oligopolists to establish a cartel or collusive arrangement.
                 However, it  is difficult as well as expensive to monitor  and enforce  an agreement or
                 understanding.  Very  few  cartels  last  long,  particularly  when  oligopolistic  firms
                 significantly differ in their cost conditions.
            4.   Under oligopoly, new entry is difficult. It is neither free nor barred. Hence the condition
                 of entry  becomes  an  important  factor  determining  the  price  or  output  decisions  of
                 oligopolistic firms, and preventing or limiting entry an important objective.
            5.   Given the indeterminacy of the individual firm's  demand and, therefore, the marginal
                 revenue curve, oligopolistic firms may not aim at maximization of profits. Modern theories
                 of oligopoly take into account the following alternative objectives of the firm:
                 (a)  Sales maximization with profit constraint.
                 (b)  Target or "fair" rate of profit and long-run stability.

                 (c)  Maximization of the managerial utility function.
                 (d)  Limiting (preventing) new entry.
                 (e)  Achieving "satisfactory" profits, sales, etc. That is, the firm is a "satisficer" and not
                     "maximizer".
                 (f)  Maximization of joint (industry) profits rather than individual (firm) profits.
            In view of the fact that the characteristics of oligopoly renders collusion (explicit or  implicit
            cartel) advantageous and feasible, theories of oligopoly are divided into three broad groups,
            namely, models  of non-collusive oligopoly, models  of collusive  oligopoly, and  managerial
            theories.
            The important models of non-collusive oligopoly are: (a) Cournot model, (b) Kinked demand
            curve models.
            The two major theories of collusive oligopoly are: (a) Joint profit maximization, and (b) Price
            leadership.
            Emphasizing the distinguishing characteristics of joint stock enterprises are the three models of
            managerial theory, namely, (a) Sales maximization with profit constraint, (b) Maximization of
            managerial utility function, and (c) Firm as a satisficer (behaviourist theory).

            12.2 Collusive Oligopoly Models

            There can be two types of collusion (a) Cartels where firms jointly fix a price and output policy
            through agreement, and (b) Price Leadership where one firm sets the price and others follow it.








                                             LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                  187
   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197