Page 122 - DCOM505_WORKING_CAPITAL_MANAGEMENT
P. 122

Unit 7: Cash Management




          determine the standard deviation of net cash flows the pasty data of the net cash flow behaviour  Notes
          can be used. Managerial attention is needed only if the cash balance deviates from the limits.

          Stone Model

          The Stone Model is somewhat similar to the Miller-Orr Model insofar as it uses control limits. It
          incorporates, however, a look-ahead forecast of cash flows when an upper or lower limit is hit
          to take into account the possibility that the surplus or deficit of cash may naturally correct itself.
          If the upper control limit is reached, but is to be followed by cash outflow days that would bring
          the cash balance down to an acceptable level, then nothing is done. If instead the surplus cash
          would  substantially remain that way, then cash is withdrawn to get  the cash  balance to  a
          predetermined return point. Of course, if cash were in short supply and the lower control limit
          was reached, the opposite would apply. In this way the Stone Model takes into consideration the
          cash flow forecast.

          Beranek Model

          According to Beranek, companies have short-term assets only because they face uncertainties
          related to their operations.

                 Example: A firm could incur substantial costs if the labor force of a vendor supplying a
          critical  part suddenly  went on  strike. An inventory of  the critical part enables  the firm  to
          continue operating while it seeks an alternate supplier or waits out the strike.

          Similarly, a firm may hold a cash reserve to meet unanticipated demand for cash. Since cash is an
          unproductive  asset, cash  reserves are  often held  in  the  form of  highly liquid  short-term
          investments.
          A = A( the cash out flow depends on the uncertain event w which makes A(w) a stochastic
          variable.

                                       W (W ,  = W  – A(
                                         1  0      0
          Beranek assumes there is a critical cash balance W* which triggers increased cost borrowing
          r + . In t = 0 we have cash of W  in t = 1  is observed and A() is paid from W  (possibly under
                                    0                                    0
          acceptance of penalty interest  ). Keep in mind, that W  here denotes the cash level that we
                                                        0
          initially establish in t = 0 with only one cash outflow A() occurring. Where as in  Baumol’s
          model W  denotes the amount that is withdrawn m times.
                  0
          The return of the policy W  is as follows:
                                0
                          ì ï ( + r  ( W *  - W  (W 0 ,   for W 1 < W * 
          h  (W 0  =,   ( -K W r  1
                        - í
                      0
                          î 0 ï otherwise
                                         
                                   
                    ï ( ì + r  ( W  *  - W 0 + A (  for A ( ³ W 0 - W  * 
                  - í
           =  ( -K  W 0 r
                    ï î 0 otherwise
          Objective function:  max E  ( (h W , 
                                  0
                           W 0
                             
                                               ( 
          E  ( (h W 0  =,   ( -K W 0  -r    (W  *  - W 0 + A ( + r  dF A
                            W 0 -W *




                                           LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                   117
   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127