Page 232 - DMGT521_PROJECT_MANAGEMENT
P. 232

Unit 13: PERT, CPM and Time Estimation




          Self Assessment                                                                       Notes

          Fill in the blanks:
          11.  ………………… enables the optimum utilization of the resources by their transfer from
               the slack to busy segments in the network in order to accomplish the stipulated goal.

          12.  A ………………… diagram can be created by hand or by using software such as Microsoft
               Project.
          13.  PERT is useful for ………………… preparation, annual shutdown and overhauls to identify
               the critical activities.

          13.7 Project Uncertainty and Risk Management


          13.7.1 Calculating Probabilistic Activity Times

          First, it is necessary to define what is meant by the terms “pessimistic,” “optimistic,” and “most
          likely” (or “normal”). Assume that all possible durations (or all possible costs) for some task can
          be  represented by a statistical  distribution. The individual or group making the estimates is
          asked for a task duration, a, such that the actual duration of the task will be lower or less than 1
          percent of the time. Thus it is an optimistic estimate. The pessimistic estimate, b, is an estimated
          duration for the same task such that the actual finish time will be b or greater less than 1 percent
          of the time. (These estimates are often referred to as “at the .99 or the 99 percent level” or at the
          “almost never  level.”)

          13.7.2 Extensions to PERT/CPM

          There have been several extensions to both network and chart forms of project scheduling. At
          times these extensions are quite sophisticated.


                 Example: The application of fuzzy set theory to aid in estimating activity durations in
          cases where activity durations are difficult to estimate because project activities cannot be well
          defined (McMahon, 1993). In this section we briefly discuss one significant extension of traditional
          scheduling methods, precedence diagramming. Elihu Goldratt’s Critical Chain (1997) is also a
          significant addition to traditional scheduling methods. It uses networks that combine project
          scheduling with resource allocation.
          We then comment on some of the managerial implications of the two fundamental approaches
          to risk management taken in this unit, statistical analysis and simulation.

          13.7.3 Precedence  Diagramming


          One shortcoming of the PERT/CPM network method is that it does not allow for leads and lags
          between two activities without greatly increasing the number of sub-activities to account for
          this. That is, our regular network methods described earlier assume that an activity can start as
          soon as its predecessor activities are completed. Sometimes, however, the restrictions are more
          complex.


                 Example: When a follow-on activity cannot begin until a certain amount of time.






                                           LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                   227
   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237