Page 235 - DMGT514_MANAGEMENT_CONTROL_SYSTEMS
P. 235

Management Control Systems




                    Notes          4.  Since build business units are often in  new and evolving industries, the experience of
                                       build managers in their industries is likely to be less. This also contributes to the greater
                                       uncertainty faced by managers of build units in dealing with external constituencies.

                                   Mission and Time Span

                                   The choice of build versus harvest strategies has implications for short-term versus long-term
                                   profit trade-offs. The share-building strategy includes (a) price cutting, (b) major R&D expenditures
                                   (to introduce new products), and (c) major market development expenditures. These actions are
                                   aimed at establishing market leadership, but they depress short-term profits. Thus, many decisions
                                   that the manager of a build unit makes today may not result in profits until some future period.
                                   A harvest strategy, on the  other hand,  demands attention to tasks with a view to maximize
                                   short-term profits.
                                   We now discuss how the form and structure of control systems might differ across business units
                                   with different missions.

                                   Programming

                                   While designing a programming process, several design issues need to be considered. There are
                                   no single answers on these design choices; rather, the answers tend to depend upon the mission
                                   being pursued by the business unit.

                                              Table  12.1: Different  Strategic Implications  for Programming  Process

                                                                  Build           Hold          Harvest
                                      Importance of         Relatively high               Relatively low
                                      programming
                                      Formalization of capital     Less formal DCF        More formal DCF
                                      Expenditure decisions   analysis;                   analysis, shorter
                                                            Longer payback                payback
                                      Capital expenditure    More emphasis on non-        More emphasis on
                                      Evaluation criteria   financial data (market        financial data (cost
                                                            share, efficient use of       efficiency, straight cash
                                                            R&D dollars etc.)             on cash incremental
                                                                                          return)
                                      Hurdle rates          Relatively low                Relatively high


                                      Capital investment analysis   More subjective and      More quantitative and
                                                            qualitative                   financial
                                      Project approval limits at   Relatively high        Relatively low
                                      the business unit level

                                   Budgeting

                                   Implications for designing budgeting systems to support varied missions are contained in the
                                   table shown below. The calculation aspects of variance analysis comparing actual results with
                                   the budget identify variances as either favourable  or unfavourable. However, a  favourable
                                   variance does not necessarily imply favourable performance; similarly, an unfavourable variance
                                   does  not necessarily  imply unfavourable  performance. The  link  between  a favourable  or
                                   unfavourable variance, on the one hand, and favourable or unfavourable performance, on the
                                   other hand, depends upon the strategic context of the business unit under evaluation.




          230                               LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240