Page 80 - DMGT514_MANAGEMENT_CONTROL_SYSTEMS
P. 80

Unit 4: Responsibility Centers




          4.8.3 Evaluation of EVA                                                               Notes

          Advantages of EVA

          1.   EVA combines profit centre and investment centre concepts. With EVA, management
               establishes a target profit or target rate of return for the business segment. Any income in
               excess of the target level is the residual income/EVA. To illustrate, the target rate of return
               for DD Ltd. is 20 % on total net assets. Total net assets are ` 800,000 and actual net income
               ` 200,000 so the target net income is 800,000  0.20 = ` 160,000. The EVA for the company is
               actual net income minus target net income = ` 200,000 – ` 160,000 = ` 40,000.

          2.   In case of EVA, different interest rates may be used for different types of assets e.g. low
               rates can be used for inventories while a higher rate can be used for investments in fixed
               assets. Furthermore, different rates may be used for different fixed assets to take  into
               account different degrees of risk.
          3.   With EVA, all business units have the same profit objective for comparable investments.
               The ROI approach, on the other hand, provides different incentives for investments across
               business units.

          4.   The EVA in contrast to ROI, has a stronger positive correlation with changes in company's
               market share.  Shareholders are  important stakeholders in a  company's market value.
               Shareholders are important stakeholders in a company.

          Difference between ROI and EVA are shown in the following table:
                                              ROI Method                          (000)

             Business     Current    Fixed Assets   Total      Budgeted       ROI
               Unit        Assets                 Investment     Profit    Objective
                A           60           60          120         24.0         20%
                B           70           50          120         14.4          12
                C           95           10          105         10.5          10
                D           35           40          75           3.8          5
                E           25           10          35          (1.8)        (5)
                                              EVA

            Business   Profit   Current   Rate   Regd.   F/A   Rate   Regs.   Budgeted
              unit    potential   assets     Ergs. On              Ergs.      EVA
                                             C/assets             For F/A
                        (1)      (2)    (3)    (4)     (5)   (6)    (7)     (1)-(4)-(7)
               A        24.0     60     4%     2.4     60   10%      6        15.6
               B        14.4     70     4      2.8     50    10      5        6.6
               C        10.5     95     4      3.8     10    10      1        5.7
               D        3.8      35     4      1.4     40    10      4        (1.6)
               E       (1..8)    25     4      1.0     10    10      1        (3.8)

          From the first portion of the calculation (ROI Method), one can observe that only one business
          unit C is ROI objective consistent with the company-wide cut-off rate, and in no unit is the
          objective consistent with the company wide 4% cost of carrying Current Assets. Business unit A
          would decrease its chances of meeting its profit objective, if it did not earn at least 20% on added
          investments in either Current Assets or Fixed Assets, whereas, units D and E would benefit from
          investments with a much lower return.






                                           LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                   75
   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85