Page 141 - DMGT519_Conflict Management and Negotiation Skills
P. 141

Unit 7: Perception and Communication




          2.   Instrumental, or operant, conditioning: Behaviors or attitudes that are followed by positive  Notes
               consequences are reinforced and are more likely to be repeated than are behaviors and
               attitudes that are followed by negative consequences.
               For example, People agree with your opinion.
          3.   Observational learning: Children watch the behavior of people around them and imitate
               what they see. For example, if a young girl hears her mother denounce all elected officials
               as crooks, she may repeat that opinion in class the next day. Whether she continues to
               repeat that opinion depends on the responses of her classmates, teacher, and parents. That
               is, observations determine the  responses we  learn, but  reinforcement determines  the
               responses we express.

          7.3.3 Cognitive Dissonance Theory

          Stresses attitude change – and that behaviors can determine attitudes.
          1.   Cognition = individuals perception of own attitudes, beliefs, behaviors. Cognitive dissonance =
               feelings of tension that arise when one is  simultaneously aware  of  two  inconsistent
               cognitions. For example, when we act contrary to  our attitudes;  or, when  we make  a
               decision favoring one alternative despite reasons favoring another.
          2.   Consistency theories hypothesize that, should inconsistencies develop among cognitions,
               people are motivated to restore harmony.

          3.   Key propositions of dissonance theory:
               1.   Dissonance theory says relationships among two cognitions can be either consonant,
                    dissonant, irrelevant

               2.   Cognitive dissonance is a noxious state. It produces unpleasant physical arousal.
               3.   Individual will attempt to reduce or eliminate dissonance – and will try to avoid
                    things that increase dissonance.

                    For example, selective observation.
               4.   Cognitive  dissonance  can  be  reduced  or  eliminated  only  by  (a) adding  new
                    cognitions, or (b) changing existing ones.

                    For example, can change our minds. Decide we were wrong.
                    For example, can “make up” information, as in the “When prophesy fails” example.
                    For example, we may seek new information that can restore consonance.
                    For example, try to discredit source of dissonance in some way – either by making
                    up info or seeking counter-evidence.

          Sources of Dissonance

          1.   Informational inconsistency. Receive information that contradicts what they already know
               or believe.

               For example, suppose you believe George Bush did not know about Iran-Contra - and
               then  suppose Oliver North testified that he was the  mastermind behind it. (Real  life
               example: some Iranians are said to believe George Bush did head up Iran-Contra, since he
               used to be head of the CIA and they think the CIA runs the country.)






                                           LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                   135
   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146