Page 146 - DMGT519_Conflict Management and Negotiation Skills
P. 146

Conflict Management and Negotiation Skills




                    Notes          could have high or low self-esteem and what caused them to have it. “…persons low in self-
                                   esteem are less likely to make effective use of self-protection strategies, we hypothesized that
                                   this strategy of deflecting the threat involved in upward comparison would be used primarily
                                   by persons who are characteristically high in self-esteem.” (Musssweiler, Gabriel, Bodenhausen,
                                   2000) According to the social comparison research by Mussweiler, Gabriel, and Bodenhausen,
                                   the majority of the individuals tested used the gender and ethnicity to either separate themselves
                                   from another or to use this factor to help them achieve a higher self esteem, or it could have the
                                   opposite effect of putting down one’s own self-worth. The overall outcome in all situations is
                                   that  people  will  develop  different  methods  to  block  out  unpleasant  feelings  of  being
                                   outperformed, the experience of inferiority.




                                      Task  Elucidate the following statements:
                                     1.   Reflective Listening focuses on personal elements of the communication and not the
                                          abstract ideas.
                                     2.   Active listening is a key trait in many successful supervisors.

                                   7.5 Application of Personality Theory in Organizations: The Meyers
                                       Briggs Type Indicator Instrument

                                   As a follow up  to Carl  Jung’s theory  that every individual is fundamentally different,  the
                                   Meyers-Briggs Type Indicator Instrument, the  MBTI, measures  an individual’s  personality
                                   preferences in  a variety of organizational settings, including: team building, management,
                                   decision making, leadership,  career counseling,  and many  more. The MBTI examines  four
                                   dichotomies: Extroversion/Introversion, Sensing/Intuition, Thinking/Feeling, and  Judging/
                                   Perceiving. Each dichotomy has an explanation about the characteristics associated with each
                                   type.
                                   The MBTI is based on the Jungian theory of personality; meaning, it can be used in all populations,
                                   including non-clinical settings. Meyers and Briggs, authors of the MBTI, used Jung’s theory to
                                   predict people’s patterns of behavior. “Because the results of the MBTI are subject to a variety of
                                   environmental  influences,  such  as  work  tasks  and  organizational  climates  and  values,
                                   interpretations have to be treated with caution and individually verified” (Michael, 2003). Many
                                   people use the MBTI test in a rigid fashion causing the results to be an inaccurate assessment of
                                   people’s personalities. If the weaknesses of the test were considered, and people would use the
                                   test with caution, adjustments can be made to determine an accurate assessment of any changes
                                   in an individual’s behavior.

                                   7.5.1  Attribution in Organizations and Managerial Implications: Using
                                          Personality, Perception, and Attribution at Work

                                   The attribution theory explains how individuals pinpoint the causes of their own behavior and
                                   that of other people. There are two sources of “power” that human beings believe are responsible
                                   for the outcome of their own actions. One source is internal; we normally relate success and
                                   elements under our control as an internal attribution. The second source is external: we normally
                                   relate failure and elements out of our control as an external attribution. Success in the workplace
                                   can simultaneously alternate between internal and external. You might have been prepared and
                                   researched for a project and believed your success was internal. On the other hand, you may
                                   believe you were lucky to have done such a great job on a project, attributing your success to
                                   external forces.




          140                               LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151