Page 147 - DMGT519_Conflict Management and Negotiation Skills
P. 147

Unit 7: Perception and Communication




          Perception of internal and external forces has resulted in the fundamental attribution error. The  Notes
          fundamental attribution error occurs when one views the bad behavior of others as internal and
          their own bad behavior as external. It is much more difficult for others to see the external forces
          surrounding the individual conducting the bad behavior, where as, it is clear to the individual
          conducting the bad behavior, to relate their own behavior to their surrounding forces. Managers
          who acknowledge the personality differences between themselves and other employees can
          begin to appreciate those personality differences and create a more effective communication
          environment.


              

             Case Study  Selective Group Perception

             The Hastorf and Cantril case study

             Background of the study
             Hastorf and Cantril’s case study analyzed what proved to be selective group perception of
             a  football game  contested between  the Dartmouth  Indians and  Princeton Tigers.  The
             football game the students watched had been played in 1951, and in that game Princeton
             won. It was a tough game, with a lot of penalties and caused uproar in series of editorials
             in campus newspapers.
             The Princeton quarterback, who is an All-American, in his last game for college, left the
             game in its second quarter with a broken nose and a mild concussion. When third quarter
             came, Dartmouth quarterback ended up with a  broken leg  after being tackled in the
             backfield.
             Methodology
             A week after the game, Hastorf and Cantril asked both Dartmouth and Princeton students
             of psychology to answer a questionnaire. The researchers then analyzed and interpreted
             the answers of those who had seen the game either in real or in a recorded movie.

             They had two other groups view a film of the game and then tabulated the number of
             infractions seen.
             Results

             The Dartmouth and Princeton students noticeably had varying responses. When asked
             who started the rough play, almost no one said that Princeton did. Furthermore, 36% of
             the Dartmouth students and 86% of the Princeton students said it was Dartmouth who
             started it. On the other hand, 53% of the Dartmouth students and 11% of the Princeton
             students that both did start it.
             In detail, here are the questions and the respective tallied answers from Dartmouth students
             and Princeton students:

             “Which team do you feel started the rough play?”
                                   Percent Dartmouth Students   Percent Princeton Students
                   Princeton started it      2                      0
                   Both started it           53                    11
                   Dartmouth started it      36                    86
                   Neither/no answer         9                      3

                                                                                Contd....



                                           LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                   141
   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152