Page 288 - DMGT519_Conflict Management and Negotiation Skills
P. 288

Conflict Management and Negotiation Skills




                    Notes          definitions of fairness held by the other party and engage in a dialogue to reach consensus on
                                   which standards of fairness apply in a given situation.
                                   Moreover, negotiators are often in the position to collectively define what is right or fair as a
                                   part of the negotiation process. In most situations, neither side holds the keys to what is absolutely
                                   right, rational, or fair. Reasonable people can disagree, and often the most important outcome
                                   that negotiators can achieve  is a  common, agreed-upon  perspective, definition  of the facts,
                                   agreement on the right way to see a problem, or standard for determining what is a fair outcome
                                   or process. Be prepared to negotiate these principles as strongly as you prepare for a discussion
                                   of the issues.
                                   Continue to  learn  from  the  experience:  Negotiation epitomises lifelong  learning.  A  good
                                   negotiator continues to learn from the experience- as he knows there are so many  different
                                   variables and  nuances when  negotiating that  no two  negotiations  can  be identical.  These
                                   differences mean that for negotiators to remain sharp, they need to continue to practise the art
                                   and science of negotiation regularly. In addition, the good negotiators take a moment to analyse
                                   each negotiation after it has concluded, to review what happened and what they learned. We
                                   recommended a three-step process:
                                   (i)  Plan a personal reflection time after each negotiation.

                                   (ii)  Periodically “take a lesson” from a trainer or coach.
                                   (iii)  Keep a  personal diary on strengths  and weaknesses and develop  a plan  to work  on
                                       weaknesses.
                                   This analysis does not have to be extensive or time-consuming. It should happen after every
                                   important negotiation, however, and it should focus on what and why question: What happened
                                   during this negotiation, why did it occur, and what can I learn? Negotiators who take the time
                                   to pause and reflect on their negotiations will find that they continue to refine their skills and
                                   that they remain  sharp and focused for their future  negotiations. Moreover,  even the  best
                                   athletes – in almost any sport – have one or more coaches to “take a lesson.”
                                   Negotiators have access to seminars to enhance their skills, books to read, and coaches who can
                                   help refine their skills. This book should be seen as one step along the way to sharpening and
                                   refining your negotiation skills, and we encourage you to continue to learn about the art and
                                   science of negotiation. We wish you the best of luck in all of your future negotiations.

                                   Self Assessment

                                   State whether the following statements are true or false:

                                   8.  Two ways to develop trust quickly are to reveal your BATNA and allow the other party to
                                       determine the ground rules of negotiation.
                                   9.  Trust and distrust are not just two sides of the same belief because trust or distrust relies
                                       upon one’s belief in the “virtuous” or “sinister” intentions underlying the conduct.
                                   10.  An unethical negotiating gambit called the “planted information” is when one side leaves
                                       something in or out of as final bargain advantageous to their opponent, only to “discover”
                                       it later and insist that it be taken out.
                                   11.  Trust plays a significant role in successful negotiations because all negotiations involve
                                       some level of risk and to be motivated to agree, the parties must believe each will perform
                                       their bargain.
                                   12.  Deterrence based trust, formed when you believe that someone else is trustworthy because
                                       there is a severe penalty if the person does not perform, is an example of intense trust.





          282                               LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293