Page 283 - DMGT519_Conflict Management and Negotiation Skills
P. 283

Unit 13: Fairness and Trust in Negotiation




          and  it  certainly has strong  connotations  of a  power relation.  Yet  it  offers  an  interesting  Notes
          juxtaposition against identification-based trust. Thompson refers to people’s attitudes towards
          legal contracts and forms of surveillance as examples of deterrence-based trust. Compared with
          identification-based trust, which operates at the level of intrinsic motivation, deterrence-based
          trust  is more  expensive  to maintain  because  it  requires external  monitoring  of  people’s
          compliance. Moreover, backfiring is  possible because, psychologically,  people often react
          negatively when they perceive that someone is controlling  their behavior  or limiting  their
          freedom. Looking at their flipside, the distinction between deterrence-based and identification-
          based trust resembles somewhat that between hard and soft forms of power.

          Values

              Values can be self-centered, internal standards accepted for one’s own behavior

              Values can be social-centered, external standards expected for another’s behavior
              Rokeach described end or terminal values and means or instrumental values

          Behaviour Rules

              Descriptive behavior rules show what people do in certain situations
              Injunctive behavior rules show what people should do in certain situations
              Injunctive behavior rules become laws and codes of ethics

          Substantive Fairness

              Seen in distribution of value

                   Proportionality
                   Reciprocity
                   Impartiality
                   Parties are heard




             Notes  Building trust requires time and even some risk, especially when we start a new
             partnership or business relationship. If you don’t fully trust each other, find ways to
             minimize your  vulnerability and thus avoid the defensiveness  that constrains  value
             creation. There are some ways to secure agreements in the absence of trust. These include
             setting up monitoring regimes, creating guarantees and proceeding incrementally. There
             is a need for trust to facilitate sharing information with the other side. The most value-
             creating agreements are those in which both sides openly share data. The result of recent
             studies by the consulting firm  ‘A.T. Kearney’ showed that trust in high-level business
             alliances is of particular significance. A direct correlation exists between trust and profit.
             It means that if you consistently share data with clients, not only will trust go up, but so
             too will the quality of your agreements and with these, so too will your profits. It may
             take several meetings to develop this trust, but it will definitely pay off. Developing trust
             has become a key source of sustainable competitive advantage. Once trust is built, keep in
             mind that it is much easier to spoil it than create it.







                                           LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                   277
   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288