Page 280 - DMGT519_Conflict Management and Negotiation Skills
P. 280

Conflict Management and Negotiation Skills




                    Notes          experienced steadily increasing acceptance and  utilization because of a perception of greater
                                   flexibility, costs below those of traditional litigation, and speedy resolution of disputes, among
                                   other perceived advantages. However, some have criticized these methods as taking away the
                                   right to seek redress of grievances in the courts, suggesting that extrajudicial dispute resolution
                                   may not offer the fairest way for parties not in an equal bargaining relationship, for example in
                                   a dispute between a consumer  and a large corporation. In addition,  in some  circumstances,
                                   arbitration and other ADR processes may become as expensive as litigation or more so

                                   Online Dispute Resolution

                                   Dispute resolution can also take place on-line or by using technology in certain cases. Online
                                   dispute resolution, a growing field of dispute resolution, uses new technologies to solve disputes.
                                   Online Dispute Resolution is also called “ODR”. Online Dispute Resolution or ODR also involves
                                   the application of traditional dispute resolution methods to disputes which arise online


                                       

                                     Case Study  Unequal Foreign Negotiation


                                              hen two parties enter into an unequal negotiation, in terms of the power they
                                              bring to the table, the interests or goals of either party can have a dramatic
                                     Winfluence on the positions they adopt in the negotiations. Sometimes this can
                                     have the affect of giving the weaker negotiating power the opportunity to gain advantages,
                                     and similarly, this unequal status can also be influenced by their interests to their detriment.
                                     The negotiation case study of the U.S. – Indonesian negotiations over the Conditions of
                                     Aid is an example of both possibilities.

                                     The takeover of China by the Communists in 1949 added a new geopolitical concern to the
                                     interests of the United States in the Far East. Two theories of strategic concern were the
                                     Domino effect of potential Communist takeover of countries near to China’s mainland,
                                     and the Leapfrog theory, where it was  considered the Communists might  try to  gain
                                     control of a country within the protected geographic sphere, and deemed a protectorate or
                                     ally of the Unites States. Of considerable concern was the potential threat to Indonesia.
                                     In the Mutual Security Act of 1951, the U.S. committed its government to providing aid to
                                     foreign countries but only in regards to that foreign government’s return commitment to
                                     U.S. long term interests. The U.S. used trade embargoes against Communist countries, and
                                     in particular China, especially as the U.S. became engaged in the Korean conflict. A foreign
                                     country could not expect any foreign aid if it were to engage in any form of trade with a
                                     member of the Communist bloc.
                                     Indonesia considered itself a neutral country. It was responsible for roughly 40% of the
                                     world’s exports in rubber. Indonesia was very strong nationalistic country and resented
                                     foreign intrusion into its affairs. There were many radical elements within Indonesia that
                                     sympathized with Communist China. The Indonesian government did not want to provide
                                     the same level of commitment required by U.S. policies. Its goals consisted of the demand
                                     that the U.S. provide assistance in the stabilization of the international price of rubber and
                                     tin. It also wanted considerable compensation in the form of foreign aid to beef up its own
                                     internal security and infrastructure. The interests of both countries were at cross purposes
                                     and posed a challenge for the negotiation that followed.
                                                                                                         Contd....






          274                               LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285