Page 132 - DMGT548_GLOBAL_HRM
P. 132

Unit 7: Training and Development




          According to Mendenhall and Oddou’s (1986) paradigm, where the duration of sojourn in the  Notes
          host culture is long (1-3 years), the degree of interaction and integration with the foreign culture
          is deemed to be high. This necessitates a high level of training rigor. The corresponding training
          approach,  the  “impression  approach”,  employs  methods  like  assessment  centres,  field
          experiences, simulations, sensitivity training and extensive language training. Information giving
          training methods like area and cultural briefings, affective training like role-playing are also
          included to provide the comprehensiveness the nature of the overseas assignment warrants.
          Hence, the length of training has to be long (1-2 months).
          This framework has been criticised for not explaining how the level of rigor of a specific CCT
          method is determined (Black and Mendenhall, 1991). One can also caution that there is no simple
          one-to-one correlation between the duration of sojourn and the required degree of interaction
          and integration with the host culture. Whereas a three-day trip to the Philippines for the purpose
          of conducting a branch audit necessitates minimal cultural integration, an assignment of the
          same duration to the Philippines for discussing and concluding the finer details of a joint venture
          warrants full cross-cultural readiness and competence.

          7.2.8 Black and Mendenhall’s Model for CCT Methods Selection


          In an attempt to improve on Tung’s (1981) and Mendenhall and Oddou’s (1986) frameworks,
          Black and Mendenhall (1989) proposes a CCT methods selection framework based on the social
          learning theory (SLT) (Bandura, 1977).


          Essence of the SLT
          The social learning theory (Bandura, 1977) states that learning can take place in two ways: One,
          by  positive  reinforcement  and  second,  by  duplicating  the  learned  behaviour  acquired
          symbolically or by associating the behaviours with the outcomes. The four core elements of the
          theory are attention, retention, reproduction and incentives.
          The trainees are more likely to pay more attention if the training model used is popular and
          easily available. If the training approach is the type that the trainees are used to, attention level
          will also be higher. In addition, where reward is expected, attention level can reach new heights.
          Retention is measured by the extent the trainees commit the principles, skills and insight acquired
          to  memory.  This  can  be  reinforced  by  frequently  modelling  and  rehearsing  the  desired
          behaviours.
          Reproduction refers to translating the learned and retained behaviours into practice. The extent
          to which this is done is greatly influenced by two factors: (1) the motivational effects of incentives,
          specifically, how far the trainees believe that displaying the desired behaviours will lead to the
          desired outcomes; (2) to what extent the trainees believe they can perform the desired behaviours.
          The SLT attempts to capture the essence of several important theories. It integrates the cognitive
          and behavioural theories. It explains the notion of motivation within the concept of self-efficacy
          as well. The issue of how the trainee acquires and display the desired behaviours taught to him
          is  also addressed. However, it is noted that “the importance of  certain variables  of SLT  is
          different in cross-cultural training situations (Black and Mendenhall, 1990). Also, attention,
          retention and reproduction can be slowed by situational factors such as high culture novelty,
          high degree of cultural interaction and integration, high job novelty (Black and  Mendenhall
          1991), and the trainees’ personal and familial characteristics (Tung 1981).










                                           LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                   127
   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137