Page 80 - DLIS003_LIBRARY ADMINISTRATION AND MANAGEMENT
P. 80

Unit 4: Job Analysis and Evaluation




          productive employees can help you retain the top talent in your library. Over-achievers are  Notes
          likely to become disillusioned with an employer if they feel their work ethic is not appreciated
          in a tangible form, or if they believe that less productive workers are treated preferentially in
          compensation decisions. Another type of employee lacks the innovative and energetic spirit of
          the over-achiever, but is persistent in a rigorous dedication to the quality and timeliness of their
          regular work. It can be easy to overlook the quiet worker who never asks for a raise, even
          though his work is consistently error-free and completed on time. Seek out these employees;
          recognize and compensate them in addition to the super-productive group to encourage
          long-term commitment in your most reliable employees.

          Goal Achievement

          Setting measurable, time-bound goals in a job evaluation can go a long way toward reducing
          feelings of unfairness in compensation and promotion decisions. Collaborate with individual
          employees to create a list of goals for the upcoming year, and let the employee know how much
          of a raise he can expect to receive if the goals are met by next year’s evaluation. The goal-setting
          approach can take nearly all of the pressure off managers at evaluation time. If an employee has
          reached his goals, he gets the agreed-upon raise; if not, then the manager can take a more
          subjective approach to the decision.

          Length of Service

          Length of service is a traditional compensable factor that innovative companies have been
          re-evaluating in recent years. Rather than rewarding employees based on their contributions to
          libraries goals, length-of-service raises compensate employees strictly for their loyalty. There is
          something to be said for promoting loyalty within your library, even at the expense of
          productivity. Under this type of compensation system, there may come a time for each employee
          where her salary at your company far exceeds the amount she could earn in a similar position
          elsewhere. This works like a double-edged sword, of course, as you would then be incurring
          higher salary expenses than others in your industry.

          Competencies

          Compensating employees for learning new skills and completing educational milestones can
          encourage personal and professional growth in your employees. Knowledge and growth can
          enhance employees’ productivity, effectiveness, satisfaction and loyalty. This can make them
          more valuable to your company and to your competitors as well, making it a wise decision to
          increase employees’ salaries when they have earned college degrees and certifications, or
          completed company-sponsored training programs.

          4.5.2 Method of Job Evaluation

          Job evaluation methods vary. The modified Aiken plan described here is a factor comparison
          plus factor analysis plus point evaluation. It is known as a Point-Factor plan. Point-Factor plans
          are considered to be particularly suitable for purposes of pay equity compliance.

          Point Factor Method

          The point factor method is the most commonly used formal approach to job evaluation. PFM is
          a technique, according to the HR Guide, that "has a set of compensable factors that measure and
          determine the worth of jobs." PFM originated during the Frederick Taylor scientific management
          movement in 1871. Then, in the 1930s, Edward Hay began the development of one of the first




                                           LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                   75
   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85