Page 16 - DLIS402_INFORMATION_ANALYSIS_AND_REPACKAGING
P. 16

Unit 1: Information Analysis, Repackaging and Consolidation



            1.8.1 Objectives of the Study                                                            Notes

            This study examines repackaging of information in libraries. The study will acquaint information
            professionals with the need to be dynamic and explore new ways of providing service.

            1.8.2 The Problem

            Libraries have to justify their existence and make a case for why their functions should not be
            outsourced. This has led to budget cuts, which have effect on services to users of the library. Worse
            still, libraries are made to recover some or all of their costs, and administrators pay little or no attention
            to the library. The growth of free library services reveals that users place relatively low value on the
            receipt of information, hence users resist any fee or charge placed on library and information services.
            Most librarians are not equipped to provide the full range of information repackaging services.
            Considering the nonchalant attitude that users exhibit towards the library and alternative information
            sources that are available, how can libraries survive?
            Guiding principles for arrangement and presentation of idea in a helpful sequence are given below

            1.9 Principles of Arrangement

            1.9.1 Basic Principle of Arrangement

            The basic principle of arrangement is that of respect des fonds, sometimes spoken of as the principle
            of provenance. The meaning of this principle has been explained by Dr. Waldo G. Leland in the
            Report of the [Illinois] State Education Building Commission to the Forty-Eighth General Assembly
            (1913).
            Each public office is an administrative unit, and its records form a homogeneous group reflecting
            its activities. This large group naturally falls into subgroups, and the subgroups into series following
            the organization and functions of the office. The principle that must be borne in mind then, is that
            the archives must be so classified that the organization and functions that have produced them
            shall be clearly reflected by them. This is the substance of the famous principle of the respect des
            fonds.




                    The principle of respect des fonds is clearly the one which has defined the archivist’s
                    role and distinguishes the archival profession from other information management
                    professions.

            The principle of respect des fonds, on the development of which additional information can be
            found in Staff Information Circular No. 5, was formulated by French archivists in the period following
            the French Revolution. It provided a rational basis for archival arrangement, substituting a system
            of preserving records by organic units or fonds for the old practice of arranging records by subject
            groups that were artificially established by the archivist. The system implicit in the principle is that
            every document will be traced to its origin and will be maintained as part of a group having the
            same origin. This guiding principle, which was refined and modified to suit the needs of various
            European archival agencies, was given a theoretical justification by the Dutch archivists S. Muller,
            J. A. Feith, and R. Fruin in their Manual for the Arrangement and Description of Archives .
            The first postulate of the principle of respect des fonds is that records will be maintained in the
            organic units or fonds in which they were originally accumulated or, conversely, that they will not
            be regrouped by subjects or in accordance with any other scheme that may be devised. In France a
            fonds was regarded as all records of a particular institution, such as an administrative authority, a
            corporation, or a family. In England the term “archive group” was used instead of “fonds,” and this




                                             LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                    11
   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21