Page 333 - DMTH402_COMPLEX_ANALYSIS_AND_DIFFERENTIAL_GEOMETRY
P. 333
Complex Analysis and Differential Geometry
Notes We may without loss of generality assume that X is a graph over the plane Y (u, v) = (u, v, 0), i.e.
X(u,v) u,v,f(u,v) . It is then straightforward to check that X is a minimal surface if and only
if f satisfies the non-parametric minimal surface equation:
1 q p 2 u 2pqp 1 p q 2 v 0, ...(11)
v
where we have used the classical notation: p = f , q = f . We say that a solution of a partial
u
v
differential equation defined on the whole (u, v)-plane is entire. Thus, to prove Bernsteins
Theorem, it suffices to prove that any entire solution of (11) is linear.
Proposition 8. Let f be an entire solution of (11). Then f is a linear function.
If f satisfies (11), then p and q satisfy the following equations:
1 q 2 pq ,
u 1 p q 2 v 1 p q 2 ...(12)
2
2
pq 1 p 2 .
2
2
u 1 p q 2 v 1 p q 2 ...(13)
Since the entire plane is simply connected, Equation (13) implies that there exists a function
satisfying:
1 p 2 pq
, ,
v
u
2
2
1 p q 2 1 p q 2
and Equation (12) implies that there exists a function satisfying:
pq 1 q 2
, .
v
u
2
2
1 p q 2 1 p q 2
Furthermore, = , hence there is a function h so that h = , h = . The Hessian of the function
v
v
u
u
h is:
h
h uu h uv u u v ,
h
ij
h
v
vv
vu
hence, h satisfies the Monge-Ampère equation:
det h ij 1. ...(14)
In addition, h > 0, thus is positive definite, and we say that h is convex. Proposition 15
h
ij
11
now follows from the following result due to Nitsche.
2
Proposition 9. Let h C 2 be an entire convex solution of the Monge-Ampère Equation (14).
Then h is a quadratic function.
326 LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY