Page 137 - DMGT403_ACCOUNTING_FOR_MANAGERS
P. 137

Accounting for Managers




                    Notes
                                     Inventory Turnover & Average Days’ Inventory on Hand
                                     An examination of trends in the inventory turnover and average days’ inventory on hand
                                     ratios also reveal positive indicators of Ford’s liquidity position. Inventory turnover, a
                                     function of cost of goods sold and inventories, has remained stable between 14.0 and 16.0
                                     times from 1992-1995. The average ratio over these four years (15.1 times) is 40% higher
                                     than that of 1991.  The average days’ inventory on hand,  a derivative of the inventory
                                     turnover, has conversely decreased to stable level fluctuating between 23.5 and 26.0 days
                                     in the  years 1992-1995.  The operating  cycle of  Ford  Motor Company has  decreased
                                     significantly as the table below indicates.
                                                 1991   1992   1993    1994   1995
                                     Days:       50.8   29.0   33.8    31.1   34.3

                                     Profitability
                                     Profit Margin
                                     Profit margin, which is net income divided by net sales, is a measure of how many dollars
                                     of net income is produced by each dollar of sales. Ford Motor Company had a substantial
                                     4 year rise in profit margin. Using horizontal analysis, the profit margin increased 98%
                                     from 1991 to 1992, 566% from 1992 to 1993 and then 79% from 1993 to 1994. Although the
                                     profit margin from 1994 to 1995 decreased 26%, that is more than acceptable when you
                                     look at the substantial increases in the past few years. In the first year, Ford had a profit
                                     margin of -3.1%. That means for every dollar of sales, Ford lost $3.10. This is obviously not
                                     a good position to be in. During 1991 and then carried over into 1992, it cost Ford more
                                     money to make sales than it did when it recorded the income for those sales. They realized
                                     at this time it was important for them to keep things such as selling and administrative
                                     expenses lower, as well as the cost of sales, which included their production, manufacturing,
                                     and warehousing costs. By following a plan more complex than I can describe here, Ford
                                     steadily increased it’s sales while it lowered it’s expenses and it’s cost of sales. This directly
                                     increased Ford’s profit margin at a substantial rate within the next three years.
                                     Asset Turnover
                                     Asset turnover involves Ford’s net sales divided by their average total assets. This ratio
                                     demonstrates the efficiency of assets used in producing sales. A company like Ford Motor
                                     Company has an enormous amount of assets. Computers to heavy equipment to buildings.
                                     All of those assets, plus many more, are all taken into consideration when figuring asset
                                     turnover.  For example,  Ford would like to  know that if it decides to purchase 20 new
                                     computer-aided engineering stations for a cost of about $2,400,000, they would like to see
                                     a  higher asset turnover  to  give them  the proof  that the  investment is  being used  at
                                     maximum efficiency. Ford’s  asset turnover  steadily increased  in incremental amounts
                                     between the years of 1991-1995, but on average it was about .43 for the entire 5 year period.
                                     Using trend analysis to understand this ratio would give you a pretty good idea that the
                                     asset turnover of Ford Motor Company is stable. Trend analysis would give you an index
                                     number for 1992 of 100, while the index number  for 1995 would be 112. These  index
                                     numbers would result in a slightly positive but relatively straight line across the page. As
                                     a prospective investor this would probably cause you to investigate more deeply as to
                                     why Ford can’t more efficiently use their assets to produce sales. As a current stockholder,
                                     this trend over the past five years may give you some comfort because of the incremental
                                     increases (at least it isn’t going down).



                                                                                                          Contd...



          132                               LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142