Page 138 - DMGT403_ACCOUNTING_FOR_MANAGERS
P. 138

Unit 6: Financial Statements: Analysis and Interpretation




                                                                                                Notes
             Return on Assets
             Return on assets is a very good profitability ratio. It is comprehensive when compared to
             profit margin and asset turnover. Return  on assets overcomes the deficiency of profit
             margin by relating the assets necessary to produce income and it overcomes the deficiency
             of asset turnover by taking into account the amount of income produced. Mathematically,
             return on assets is equal to net income divided by average total assets, or more simply put,
             profit margin times asset turnover. Ford can improve it’s overall profitability by increasing
             it’s profit margin, the  asset turnover, or both.  Looking at the numbers, it was  actually
             Ford’s increase in profit margin that really gave it the boost it needed to raise the return
             on assets from the black to the red. A steady increase in return on assets from -1.3% in 1991
             to an acceptable 2.2% in 1994 is a good sign to investors. This steady climb of 169% resulted
             in an overall increase in the earning power of Ford Motor Company. Ford’s increase in
             profitability shows satisfactory earning power which results in investors continuing to
             provide capital to it.

             Debt to Equity
             The debt  to equity ratio shows the portion of the company financed  by creditors  in
             comparison  to  that  financed  by  the  stockholders.  It  is  total  liabilities  divided  by
             stockholder’s equity. Ford’s debt  to  equity ratio  is  relatively  high. When  measuring
             profitability, a high debt to equity ratio means the company has high debt and must earn
             more profit to protect the payment of interest to it’s creditors. This high debt to equity
             ratio would also interest stockholders because it shows what part of the business is financed
             through borrowing or in other words, is debt financed. Of the five years we analyzed, the
             lowest debt to equity ratio was during 1991 (6.65) and the highest was in 1993 (11.71). In
             comparison to return on assets, a higher creditor financed year such as 1991 did not have
             an positive effect on profitability. It seemed that through increased borrowing in 1993, a
             higher debt to equity ratio was produced, but overall profitability also went up. Debt to
             equity is only one part in a full profitability analysis. The only real information that the
             debt to equity ratio can produce is it can show how much expansion is possible through
             the borrowing of long-term funds; basically it show’s a company’s long-term solvency.
             A higher debt to equity ratio essentially means that the company will be able to borrow
             less money. The company must rely more on stockholder investment. Ford was able to
             lower it’s borrowing of funds from 1993 through 1994 and into 1995, while still effectively
             increasing it’s profit margin  and return on assets.  This means Ford was able to  use
             stockholder’s  investments to increase it’s profitability rather than borrow the funds  to
             do it.
             Return on Equity

             Return on equity is the ratio of net income divided by the average stockholder’s equity.
             This ratio is of great interest to stockholders because it shows how much they have earned
             on their investment in the business. In the years of 1991 and 1992, stockholders lost money
             on their investment in Ford Motor Company. No one likes to lose money, even if it is a
             couple of cents on the dollar. A major stockholder could incur quite a loss because of this.
             In the next three years, return on equity was on the positive side, the peak being in 1994
             when stockholders earned about  28% on every dollar  invested. Quite  a good return
             considering some investors are happy with a steady 8% return. Considering the previous
             years, the return on equity for Ford seems to be positive. Common knowledge dictates
             that most companies experience a downturn every now and then. Ford’s investors are able
             to remain invested in the company because it’s overall 5 year return on equity is high
             enough to give investors the high returns they seek. A return on equity consistently above
             16% with a few negative years mixed in is certainly lucrative enough to maintain a strong
                                                                                 Contd...



                                           LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                   133
   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143