Page 50 - DMGT514_MANAGEMENT_CONTROL_SYSTEMS
P. 50

Unit 3: Behavioural Considerations




                                                                                                Notes
              

             Case Study  Victor Automobiles

                   ictor Automobiles was established in  the year 1985 and  employed more than
                   3,000 people in its production and operations plants. Its four plants were located
             Vat Chennai, Noida, Kolhapur and Bhubaneswar. The operations manager of the
             Kolhapur plant, Vikas Kapoor was considered to be one of the toughest bosses to work
             with.  He gave the employees  stringent  deadlines  and never  bothered to  find  out  if
             employees were having any difficulty in completing their work. The employees felt the
             environment was too tense and were unhappy that there was no career growth. There was
             a heavy turnover of employees at the Kolhapur plant.
             Sensing that something was wrong, the top management transferred Kapoor to another
             branch, and appointed Jaychandran as the operations manager of the unit. Jaychandran
             had 20 year of experience as an operations manager. His style of control was different
             from that of Kapoor’s. He set strategies in consultation with the workers and designed
             plans to solve problems jointly. He did not believe in blaming a particular individual for
             its  occurrence.  When  he  found  that  an employee’s  performance was  moving  in  an
             undesirable direction, he met the employee personally and looked for the reasons for this.
             He then developed an appropriate solution to the  problem. The  reward system  under
             Jaychandran was not based on one or two specific measures of performance, but on the
             employee’s overall performance. His style was not to punish employees for past actions
             but to help them improve their performance in the future.
             He believed in the philosophy of management by walking around, and made it a point to
             spend some time talking to employees and listening to their problems. He felt that such
             informal communication would help boost  the confidence  of the  employees in  their
             employers.
             Jaychandran held the view that through MBWA, the values and culture of the organization
             could be instilled in the employees and the problems of the employees too could be sorted
             out.
             Questions
             1.  The managerial styles used by Kapoor and Jaychandran were different. What effect
                 do these managerial styles have on control systems?
             2.  The case discusses managerial styles and their impact on control systems. What are
                 the various factors a manager has to consider before finalizing on a particular style?

          3.10 Summary


              In  this  unit  we  have  studied the  concept  of  goal  congruence  and  informal  factors
               influencing it.

              In broad sense individual actions to achieve personal goals should also help to achieve the
               organization goal.
              This serves the purpose of Management in achievement of high level of goal congruence.

              Managerial style is an organizational concept which is related to corporate culture.
              The prime functions of a  controller are the responsibility  which involves  completely
               designing and operating the management control system.




                                           LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                   45
   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55