Page 48 - DMGT520_ORGANIZATION_CHANGE_AND_DEVELOPMENT
P. 48

Unit 3: Models of Change




          In second-order change, the nature of the organization is fundamentally and substantially altered  Notes
          ±  the  organization  is  transformed.  Second-order  change  goes  by  many  different  labels:
          transformational, revolutionary, radical, or discontinuous change. OD programs are directed
          toward  both  first  and  second-order  change,  with  an  increasing  emphasis  on  second-
          order transformational change. The model distinguishes between organizational climate and
          organizational culture.
          Organizational climate is defined as peoples perceptions and attitudes about the organization-
          whether it is a good or bad place to work, friendly or unfriendly, hard-working or easygoing,
          and so forth. These perceptions are relatively easy to change because they are built on employees
          reactions to current managerial and organization practices. On the other hand, organizational
          culture is  defined as  deep-seated assumptions,  values, and beliefs that  are enduring,  often
          unconscious, and difficult to change.

                  Figure  3.10:  The Transformational  Factors Involved  in Second-order  Change




















          Changing culture is much more difficult than changing climate.
          The premise of the Burke-Litwin model is this: OD interventions  directed toward structure,
          management practices, and  systems  (policies and  procedures) result  in first-order  change;
          interventions directed toward mission and strategy, leadership, and organization culture result
          in  second-order  change.  The model  also  makes  a  distinction  between  transactional  and
          transformational leadership styles. These two concepts come from leadership research which
          found that some leaders are capable of obtaining extraordinary performance from followers
          while other  leaders are not. Transformational leaders are  “leaders who inspire followers to
          transcend their own self-interest for the good of the organization and who are capable of having
          a profound and extraordinary effect on their followers.” Transformational leadership embodies
          inspiration which leads to new heights of performance. Transactional leaders are “leaders who
          guide or  motivate their followers in the direction of established goals by clarifying role  and
          task requirements.” Transactional leadership embodies a fair exchange between leader  and
          follower that leads to “normal” performance. Transactional leadership is sufficient for causing
          first-order change. Transformational leadership is required for  causing second-order change.
          Now let us look at the Burke-Litwin model. We will do so in several steps. Following figure
          shows the factors involved in first-order (transactional) change. Changing structure, management
          practices, and systems cause changes in work unit climate, which change motivation and, in
          turn, individual and organizational performance. Transactional leadership is required to make
          this change in organizational climate.

          On the other hand, if we want to cause second-order (transformational) change, we must change
          mission and strategy, leadership styles, and organization culture, as shown in the above figure.




                                           LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                   43
   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53