Page 180 - DMGT524_TOTAL_QUALITY_MANAGEMENT
P. 180

Unit 12: Failure Mode and Effect Analysis




          the effectiveness of corrective actions and can also be used to evaluate the value to the  Notes
          organization of performing the FMEA. To calculate revised RPNs, the analysis team assigns a
          second set of Severity, Occurrence and Detection ratings for each issue (using the same rating
          scales) and multiplies the revised ratings to calculate the revised RPNs. If both initial and
          revised RPNs have been assigned, the percent reduction in RPN can also be calculated as follows:
                                                         RPN
                                                   RPN −     r
                                                       i
                                 % Reduction in RPN =
                                                       RPN i
          For example, if the initial ratings for a potential problem are S = 7, O = 8 and D = 5 and the revised
          ratings are S = 7, O = 6 and D = 4, then the percent reduction in RPN from initial to revised is (280-
          168)/280, or 40%. This indicates that the organization was able to reduce the risk associated with
          the issue by 40% through the performance of the FMEA and the implementation of corrective
          actions.

                                            Table 12.1













          Occurrence/Severity Matrix

          Because the RPN is the product of three ratings, different circumstances can produce similar or
          identical RPNs. For example, an RPN of 100 can occur when S = 10, O = 2 and D = 5; when S = 1,
          O = 10 and D = 10; when S = 4, O = 5 and D = 5, etc. In addition, it may not be appropriate to give
          equal weight to the three ratings that comprise the RPN. For example, an organization may
          consider issues with high severity and/or high occurrence ratings to represent a higher risk
          than issues with high detection ratings. Therefore, basing decisions solely on the RPN (considered
          in isolation) may result in inefficiency and/or increased risk.
          The Occurrence/Severity matrix provides an additional or alternative way to use the rating
          scales to prioritize potential problems. This matrix displays the Occurrence scale vertically and
          the Severity scale horizontally. The points represent potential causes of failure and they are
          marked at the location where the Severity and Occurrence ratings intersect. The analysis team
          can then establish boundaries on the matrix to identify high, medium and low priorities.




             Caselet     Application of Failure Modes and Effects Analysis in
                         iCubed Technologies


             Requirement
             The requirement was to evaluate the potential risks associated with the design of a cash
             handling mechanism to provide confidence that the specified performance could be
             achieved.
                                                                                 Contd...




                                           LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                   175
   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185