Page 220 - DMGT548_GLOBAL_HRM
P. 220

Unit 11: Multinational Performance Management




             this is done in order to gain information how things are running and how the expatriate  Notes
             is managing his/her work tasks.
             The typical evaluator for the expatriate is the immediate manager, because he/she possesses
             useful  knowledge  and  information  in  order  to  perform  a  qualitative  evaluation.
             Nonetheless, when the entire project is evaluated Skanska utilises the evaluation process
             through a manager from the human resource department. During the evaluation process
             of the expatriates there are two people involved, the immediate manager and the project
             manager. Apart from the expatriation evaluation the project manager further evaluates
             different work groups in order to gather information how the situation in different groups
             are and if some people do not get along they could be transferred between groups. Finally,
             the immediate manager has a meeting with the project manager to discuss the expatriate
             and his/her performances.
             When evaluating  and interviewing the expatriates Skanska sometimes finds out that the
             work  group has unresolved problems. These often occur due to the intimate nature of
             living within the camp and for the fact that people do not always get along. In order to
             solve these sorts of problems the company sometimes has to relocate or send home a few
             expatriates. Evidence shows that expatriates who originate from sparsely populated areas
             in  Sweden are those who most successfully manage to  adapt to the life in camp. Mr.
             Ousbäck explains  this by claiming that they have  experience of  living under similar
             circumstances  and  are therefore  accustomed to  a situation  where everyone  knows
             everything about  everyone.
             Skanska does not change its evaluation strategy for different projects because each project has
             the same organisation and also the same evaluation process.
             Question
             Summarise the performance evaluation method of Skanska.

          Source:  epubl.ltu.se/1402-1552/2007/005/LTU-DUPP-07005-SE.pdf

          11.5 Summary

              Performance management refers to the ongoing process of setting goals, self-assessment,
               manager assessment, peer-assessment, coaching, development planning, and evaluation.
              It  provides  a  convenient  starting  point  of  the  link  between  the  multinational’s
               internationalisation strategies, its goals for individuals international operations in terms
               of contribution to global profitability, and individual performance management, whether
               PCN, TCN or HCN.
              The multinational has specific expectations for each of its foreign affiliates in terms of
               market performance and contribution to total profits and competitiveness.

              Individual performance management involves job analysis, job goals and standards, and
               performance appraisal. It comprises a formal process of goal setting, performance appraisal,
               and feedback.
              Performance  management is a process that enables  the multinational  to evaluate and
               continuously improve individual, subsidiary unit, and corporate performance,  against
               clearly defined, pre-set goals and targets.
              By adopting a performance management approach, multinationals are building on the
               goal-setting strengths of management-by-objectives and more  traditional methods  of
               performance appraisal.




                                           LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                   215
   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225