Page 255 - DMGT552_VISUAL_MERCHANDISING
P. 255

Visual Merchandising




                    Notes          In this unit, we will study, Quality and Process in Visual Merchandising. We will also focus on
                                   Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs).

                                   13.1 Quality and Process


                                   Visual merchandising or display is “showing” merchandise and concepts at their very best, with
                                   the end purpose of making a sale. Efficient quality and process are the main requisites of this
                                   VM.

                                   13.1.1 Service Quality Delivery and Maintenance


                                   Consumer spending is under pressure. With many retailers chasing ever fewer rupees with the
                                   very same merchandise, tremendous price competition has ensued. However, only the largest
                                   retailers with huge economies of scale are winning this game. There are opportunities to succeed
                                   other than offering the best deal, but retailers are having trouble exploiting them because they
                                   are unable to differentiate their businesses, respond  to changing  demographics, or  contain
                                   contact centre costs without negatively impacting customer service and sales.

                                       !

                                     Caution Retailers that are able to define and implement solutions to these challenges are
                                     those that will successfully compete and thrive into the future.
                                   Service quality is a concept that has aroused considerable interest and debate in the research
                                   literature because of the difficulties in both defining it and measuring it with no overall consensus
                                   emerging on either (Wisniewski, 2001). There are a number of different “definitions” as to what
                                   is meant by service quality. One that is commonly used defines service quality as the extent to
                                   which a service meets customers’ needs or expectations (Lewis and Mitchell, 1990; Dotchin and
                                   Oakland, 1994a; Asubonteng et al., 1996; Wisniewski and Donnelly, 1996). Service quality can
                                   thus be defined as the difference between customer expectations of service and perceived service.
                                   If expectations are greater than performance, then perceived quality is less than satisfactory and
                                   hence customer dissatisfaction occurs (Parasuraman et al., 1985; Lewis and Mitchell, 1990).

                                   Always there exists an important question: why should service quality be measured?



                                     Did u know? Measurement allows for comparison before and after changes, for the location
                                     of quality related problems and for the establishment of clear standards for service delivery.
                                   Edvardsen et al. (1994) state that in their experience, the starting point in developing quality in
                                   services is analysis and measurement.
                                   There are  seven  major gaps in  the  service quality  concept.  The model is  an extension of
                                   Parasuraman et al. (1985). According to the following explanation (ASI Quality Systems, 1992;
                                   Curry, 1999; Luk and Layton, 2002), the three important gaps, which are more associated with
                                   the external customers, are Gap1, Gap5 and Gap6; since they have a direct relationship with
                                   customers.
                                   Gap 1: Customers’ expectations  versus management perceptions: as a result of the lack of a
                                   marketing research orientation, inadequate upward communication and too many layers  of
                                   management.

                                   Gap  2:  Management perceptions  versus  service  specifications:  as a  result  of  inadequate
                                   commitment to service quality, a perception of unfeasibility, inadequate task standardisation
                                   and an absence of goal setting.



          250                               LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260