Page 293 - DCOM504_SECURITY_ANALYSIS_AND_PORTFOLIO_MANAGEMENT
P. 293

Security Analysis and Portfolio Management




                    Notes              Under the APT, an asset is mispriced if its current price diverges from the price predicted
                                       by the model. The asset price today should equal the sum of all future cash flows discounted
                                       at the  APT rate, where the expected return of the asset is a linear  function of various
                                       factors, and sensitivity to changes in each factor is represented by a factor-specific beta
                                       coefficient.
                                       A correctly priced asset here may be in fact a synthetic asset – a portfolio consisting of other
                                       correctly priced assets. This portfolio has the same exposure to each of the macroeconomic
                                       factors as the mispriced asset. The arbitrageur creates the portfolio by identifying x correctly
                                       priced assets (one per factor plus one) and then weighting the assets such that portfolio
                                       beta per factor is the same as for the mispriced asset.
                                       When the investor is long the asset and short the portfolio (or vice versa) he has created a
                                       position which has a positive expected return (the difference between asset return and
                                       portfolio return) and which has a net-zero exposure to any macroeconomic factor and is,
                                       therefore, risk free (other than for firm specific risk). The arbitrageur is thus in a position
                                       to make a risk free profit:
                                   2.  Where today’s price is too low: The implication is that at the end of the period the portfolio
                                       would have appreciated at the  rate implied  by the APT, whereas  the mispriced asset
                                       would have appreciated at more than this rate. The arbitrageur could therefore:
                                       Today:    (a)  Short-sell the portfolio
                                                 (b)  Buy the mispriced-asset with the proceeds.
                                                 (c)  At the end of the period:

                                                      (i)  Sell the mispriced asset
                                                      (ii)  Use the proceeds to buy back the portfolio
                                                      (iii)  Pocket the difference.

                                   3.  Where today’s price is too high: The implication is that at the end of the period the portfolio
                                       would have appreciated at the  rate implied  by the APT, whereas  the mispriced asset
                                       would have appreciated at less than this rate. The arbitrageur could therefore:
                                       Today:    (a)  Short sell the mispriced-asset

                                                 (b)  Buy the portfolio with the proceeds
                                                 (c)  At the end of the period:
                                                      (i)  Sell the portfolio
                                                      (ii)  Use the proceeds to buy back the mispriced-asset

                                                      (iii)  Pocket the difference
                                   4.  Relationship with the Capital Asset Pricing Model: The APT along with the CAPM is one
                                       of two influential theories on asset pricing. The APT differs from the CAPM in that it is less
                                       restrictive in its assumptions. It allows for an explanatory (as opposed to statistical) model
                                       of asset returns. It assumes that each investor will hold a unique portfolio with its own
                                       particular array of betas, as opposed to the identical “market portfolio.” In some ways, the
                                       CAPM can be considered a “special case” of the APT in that the securities market line
                                       represents a single-factor model of the asset price, where Beta is exposure to changes in
                                       value of the market.






          288                               LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY
   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298