Page 137 - DEDU403_EDUCATIONAL_TECHNOLOGY_ENGLISH
P. 137

Unit-13: Flander’s Interaction Analysis System




                     9.  Teaching and teacher, brings both improved this method.                            Notes
                     10.  It can also be used successfully in simulation.
                    11.  It is a scientific and objective method.

                     12.  It is able to observe subtle micro classroom behavior.
                     13.  It has proved very beneficial in various research activities.

                   Self-Assessment

                     2.  Multiple Choice Questions:
                       (i)  Who developed ten categories?
                           (a) Flander          (b) Arastu
                           (c) Pluto            (d) Marsal
                      (ii)  In which form classroom behavior analysis can be explain and expressed?
                           (a) Positive         (b) Qualitative
                           (c) Negative         (d) Objective
                      (iii)  Interaction analysis technique is which technique of the interaction paradigm?
                           (a) Small            (b) Large

                           (c) Objective        (d) Explanatory

                   13.9  Limitations of Flander’s Method

                     1.  This method is used only in the classroom with verbal behaviors, but not with nonverbal behaviors.
                     2.  In this method, curriculum, and teaching points or text on any type of case is ignored.
                     3.  This method of studying classroom practices that amount in 10 categories, which are treated fairly
                       limited. 10 classes in total volume study of classroom teaching practices, not possible. In this method,
                       promiscuous behavior may go unnoticed.
                     4.  In this method, very little attention is given to the student statement and the statement pursuing
                       teacher. It’s not fair.
                     5.  It requires trained inspectors.
                     6.  Using this system seems to be a lot of time and energy.


                   13.10 Modification in the Flander’s Interaction Analysis System
                   Keeping in mind the limitations of the method of analysis of interactions Frlander over 1968 in the
                   ‘reciprocal square method’, Kogan in 1965 and in 1966 a new system Hulf and Charles M. Meedon the
                   Globe in 1969 in the method presented their amend the same.
                   Globe efforts are the most popular. The name of the system—I.D.E.R. System. It’s both verbal and
                   nonverbal interactions are measured.

                   13.11  Galloway Supervision System : I.D.E.R. System

                   The system developed in 1969 by Charles M. Globe. Globe in the teaching of both verbal and nonverbal
                   behaviors of the system is measured. He follows standard interconnection process is displayed—



                                                    LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY                                   131








                                                                                                                       29/07/13   10:22 PM
          Educational Technology   131                                                                                 29/07/13   10:22 PM
          Educational Technology   131
   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142